NEW DELHI: Amid the raging debate and growing protests from the community over the proposed amendments to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019, The National Council for Transgender Persons members from the community in a meeting with senior officials of the ministry of social justice and empowerment on Saturday strongly reiterated that “self-affirmation of transgender identity, as upheld in the NALSA judgment, must remain the foundation of transgender identification”.The TG (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill 2026 was introduced in Lok Sabha on March 13. Since then vociferous demands for withdrawal of the Bill have been raised. On Sunday, a Jan Sunwai (public discussion) was held at the Press Club of India to demand the withdrawal of the Bill where a large number of community members gathered and spoke.Meanwhile, community representatives Abhina Aher, Vidya Rajput, Raveena Bareeha and Kalaki Subramanyam who are members of National Council for Transgender Persons – a statutory body under the law attended the meeting called at short notice by the ministry on Saturday. Israel Iran WarUS-Israel-Iran War News Live Updates: Iran vows tit-for-tat strike after Trump’s 48hr ultimatum, threatens to hit US-Israel energy facilityWatch: Missile strike rocks Israel’s ‘Little India’ as Iran attack injures over 40; videos show chaosOver 100 injured in Israel amid Iran’s missile attack; Netanyahu calls it ‘difficult evening in battle for future’According to Aher the community members in the Council were not consulted before the bill was brought to Parliament.The members highlighted the absence of the social justice minister Virendra kumar who they were told would be chairing the meeting. “We were told that the minister was unable to attend due to ill health and a reported family emergency,” Aher said.According to Aher, at the meeting led by joint secretary Yogita Swaroop, Senior Economic Advisor in the ministry, govt officials raised concerns about identifying “genuine” transgender persons and referred to biological markers such as chromosomal combinations (XX/XY). “NCTP members clarified the concept of gender incongruence/dysphoria, mental health aspects, and the impact of stigma, though they felt that a gap in understanding of transgender issues was observed among the officials,” she added.The TG Council members also emphasised at the meeting that the proposed definition is not inclusive and must explicitly include transgender men and transgender women; use respectful terminology and recognise diverse regional identities like Nupi Manabi and Nupi Manba (Manipur).On the proposed recommendation regarding screening by a medical board NCTP members initially called for the removal of the provision. “However, considering the govt’s position, members proposed that any assessment should be limited to mental health support, it must not involve invasive physical examinations, and it should uphold dignity and remain aligned with the NALSA judgment,” Aher said. The need for gender-neutral laws to address violence against transgender persons was raised vociferously.Meanwhile, at the Jan Sunwai (public discussion) on Sunday organised by ‘Rachnatmak Congress, the party’s dedicated platform for engagement with civil society groups, its chairperson Sandeep Dixit made a strong pitch for the Bill to be a parliamentary standing committee. Congress party’s Lok Sabha MP Renuka Chowdhary joined the meet in solidarity.Rajya Sabha member from RJD Manoj Jha warned that the BJP led NDA govt does not have a good record of sending Bills to standing committees, so a street protest is the need of the hour. CPI(M)’s John Brittas mentioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s appreciation of the 2019 Act and how it gives people a right to live with dignity, and questioned why this sentiment had suddenly changed.Demanding the withdrawal of the bill, Anish Gawande, National Spokesperson of the NCP asserted “Our identity is our right and this flows from our Constitution.”The discussion saw wide participation from members of the LGBTQI+ community. Samar, a trans man, questioned how a medical board can decide what he feels and how he wishes to live his life. How can his identity be questioned by the State, by doctors and the society?Grace Banu, a trans Dalit activist, was also present at the meeting. She spoke of the struggles that they have faced since 2009 in gaining recognition and the right to live a dignified life. She, along with others, went through the scrutiny of the medical boards and police violence in 2009. “In 2014 after a long fight the Supreme Court in NALSA finally said that you are not others, not an alien entity, but you are humans and gave the trans community the right to self-identify and live a dignified life. However, after all these years, we are standing at the same spot again, being asked to prove our gender identity and getting told that they do not deserve the same rights as everyone else,” Banu said. She ended her address on a collective note, “We don’t want your sympathetic welfare, we need fundamental rights!”End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPakistan Tops Global Terrorism Index With Highest Death Toll, Raises Global Alarm‘Was Tortured’: Wife Of Deceased PWC Official Seeks Bhullar’s Arrest Before Post-MortemSanjay Raut Fires ‘Jhola Uthaiye’ Salvo At Narendra Modi Over inflation, Rupee CrashFirst China-Bound Russian Oil Tanker Reaches India After US Sanctions WaiverNarendra Modi Reviews Energy Security As Middle East Crisis Deepens8931 Days In Office: PM Modi Becomes Longest-Serving Head Of Govt Overtaking Pawan Kumar Chamling‘Zelenskyy Regime Core Exporter Of Instability’: Russia Reacts To NIA Arrest Of Ukrainians In India‘Selective Narrative’: 275 Ex-Officials, Judges Slam USCIRF Over ‘Disturbing’ Report On IndiaLPG Tanker ‘Pyxis Pioneer’ With Over 47,000 Tonnes Of Fuel From US Arrives At New Mangalore PortSeveral Injured In Dimona As Iranian Missile Hits Israel’s ‘Little India’; Videos Show Chaos123Photostories5 nutrient-rich vegetable peels you should never throw awayHow to make Dhaba-style Paneer Butter Masala at homeIn pics: India’s sea-based deterrent triad – INS Arihant, Arighaat & AridhamanTV friendships that defined a generation: From ‘Friends’ to ‘The Big Bang Theory,’ the bonds we never got overTOISA 2025 winner list (part 1): Mithali Raj, Shubman Gill, Harmanpreet Kaur, and more win bigConstant urge to pee but little output? A urologist explains what your body might be telling you5 factors to consider before investing in real estateTOISA 2025 celebrates India’s sporting excellence with Smriti Mandhana and Samrat Rana leading the honoursCan’t stop overthinking conversations before bed? What your brain is doing and how to break the cycleWho is Leena Nair? From Kolhapur to leading Chanel’s Rs 360 crore empire123Hot PicksIran newsGautam SinghaniaStrait of HormuzGold rate todayIncome Tax CalculatorPublic holidays March 2026Bank Holidays MarchTop TrendingBihar board result 2026Air India Boeing 77760% free seat ruleQatar LNG ExportsMojtaba KhameneiJames GraceySpring EquinoxDiesel price hike8th Pay CommissionPremium Petrol Price Hike
NEW DELHI: Amid the raging debate and growing protests from the community over the proposed amendments to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019, The National Council for Transgender Persons members from the community in a meeting with senior officials of the ministry of social justice and empowerment on Saturday strongly reiterated that “self-affirmation of transgender identity, as upheld in the NALSA judgment, must remain the foundation of transgender identification”.The TG (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill 2026 was introduced in Lok Sabha on March 13. Since then vociferous demands for withdrawal of the Bill have been raised. On Sunday, a Jan Sunwai (public discussion) was held at the Press Club of India to demand the withdrawal of the Bill where a large number of community members gathered and spoke.Meanwhile, community representatives Abhina Aher, Vidya Rajput, Raveena Bareeha and Kalaki Subramanyam who are members of National Council for Transgender Persons – a statutory body under the law attended the meeting called at short notice by the ministry on Saturday. According to Aher the community members in the Council were not consulted before the bill was brought to Parliament.The members highlighted the absence of the social justice minister Virendra kumar who they were told would be chairing the meeting. “We were told that the minister was unable to attend due to ill health and a reported family emergency,” Aher said.According to Aher, at the meeting led by joint secretary Yogita Swaroop, Senior Economic Advisor in the ministry, govt officials raised concerns about identifying “genuine” transgender persons and referred to biological markers such as chromosomal combinations (XX/XY). “NCTP members clarified the concept of gender incongruence/dysphoria, mental health aspects, and the impact of stigma, though they felt that a gap in understanding of transgender issues was observed among the officials,” she added.The TG Council members also emphasised at the meeting that the proposed definition is not inclusive and must explicitly include transgender men and transgender women; use respectful terminology and recognise diverse regional identities like Nupi Manabi and Nupi Manba (Manipur).On the proposed recommendation regarding screening by a medical board NCTP members initially called for the removal of the provision. “However, considering the govt’s position, members proposed that any assessment should be limited to mental health support, it must not involve invasive physical examinations, and it should uphold dignity and remain aligned with the NALSA judgment,” Aher said. The need for gender-neutral laws to address violence against transgender persons was raised vociferously.Meanwhile, at the Jan Sunwai (public discussion) on Sunday organised by ‘Rachnatmak Congress, the party’s dedicated platform for engagement with civil society groups, its chairperson Sandeep Dixit made a strong pitch for the Bill to be a parliamentary standing committee. Congress party’s Lok Sabha MP Renuka Chowdhary joined the meet in solidarity.Rajya Sabha member from RJD Manoj Jha warned that the BJP led NDA govt does not have a good record of sending Bills to standing committees, so a street protest is the need of the hour. CPI(M)’s John Brittas mentioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s appreciation of the 2019 Act and how it gives people a right to live with dignity, and questioned why this sentiment had suddenly changed.Demanding the withdrawal of the bill, Anish Gawande, National Spokesperson of the NCP asserted “Our identity is our right and this flows from our Constitution.”The discussion saw wide participation from members of the LGBTQI+ community. Samar, a trans man, questioned how a medical board can decide what he feels and how he wishes to live his life. How can his identity be questioned by the State, by doctors and the society?Grace Banu, a trans Dalit activist, was also present at the meeting. She spoke of the struggles that they have faced since 2009 in gaining recognition and the right to live a dignified life. She, along with others, went through the scrutiny of the medical boards and police violence in 2009. “In 2014 after a long fight the Supreme Court in NALSA finally said that you are not others, not an alien entity, but you are humans and gave the trans community the right to self-identify and live a dignified life. However, after all these years, we are standing at the same spot again, being asked to prove our gender identity and getting told that they do not deserve the same rights as everyone else,” Banu said. She ended her address on a collective note, “We don’t want your sympathetic welfare, we need fundamental rights!”
