Calcutta high court (ANI image) KOLKATA: A survivor of a heinous crime like trafficking cannot be called repeatedly for cross-examination, Calcutta high court ruled while setting aside a trial court order, report Srishti Lakhotia and Dwaipayan Ghosh. The girl, then a minor, left home on Jan 29, 2023, and did not return, as per complaint lodged by her mother. When she was found, the girl informed that she was sold to a hotelier in Bengal for ‘commercial sex purposes’, her lawyer said. Six people were arrested and a chargesheet was filed under IPC and Pocso Act. The trial commenced after charges were framed on Dec 8, 2023. The survivor appeared for trial on Feb 27, 2024 and again on March 15, when she was cross-examined. Five months later, the lawyer representing one of the accused filed a plea on Aug 13, 2024, to recall her for further cross-examination. Pocso court allowed it. But HC invoked its powers under CrPC section 482 to scrap it, with Justice Chaitali Chatterjee Das saying the trial court had “passed the order without assigning any reason”. Reacting to the HC order, the survivor’s counsel said, “This is a win for the voiceless.”End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosShankh Air Founder Speaks Out As Airline Eyes March Launch, Targets Intl Flights By 2029’Their Islamist Ideas…’: Ex-Bangladesh Minister Hits Out Over Attacks on Hindus And Christians’Very Petty & Shameful’: Shashi Tharoor On Row Over KKR Selecting Bangladeshi Player In IPLINLD President Calls For Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal Type Uprising In India Politics, Triggers RowBJP Claims Rahul Gandhi Ties To ‘Anti-India’ Panel Over US Lawmakers’ Umar Khalid LetterNot All Are Illiterate: Rajnath Singh Cites Red Fort Blast, Flags Educated, White Collar Terrorists’Arunachal Pradesh Is And Will Always Be…’ Jaishankar Warns China, Blasts Harassment Of IndiansBullet Train Gets August 15, 2027 India Launch Date, Minister Shares Details On Tunnel BreakthroughCleanest City Hit By Water Contamination As Lab Links Indore Diarrhoea Outbreak To Pipeline LeakUS Lawmaker Raja Krishnamoorthi Condemns Violence Against Hindus In Bangladesh Urges Global Action Up123PhotostoriesWhy your fish keeps dying: 5 mistakes most aquarium owners make without realising7 foods to combine with sweet potato for a wholesome breakfastOlder people who live happily, do these 10 things in their 30 and 40s8 winter pickles to add warmth and taste to your mealsLessons from centenarians: What the world’s longest-living people eat‘Shark Tank India Season 5’: FULL LIST of judges, their net worth, and the brands they ownKylie Jenner-Timothée Chalamet to complete 3 years of dating in 2026: 3 relationship lessons to learn from themHow to make Dhaba-style Dal Makhani at homeAttract True Love During the January 2026 Full Moon; According To Birth Number10 oldest trees in the world that are still living and where can they be found123Hot PicksPremarital Test OmanVande Bharat Sleeper TrainJanuary Bank holidayGold rate todayIncome Tax RefundBahrain Golden Visa 2025Bank Holidays DecemberTop TrendingSan Francisco 49ersBrittany MahomesNoah Lyles and Junelle Bromfield Net WorthWayne Gretzky Daughter Net WorthSidney Crosby LifestyleLeBron James vs Stephen Curry Net WorthTom BradyLeBron James WifeCam ThomasCharlie Kirk
KOLKATA: A survivor of a heinous crime like trafficking cannot be called repeatedly for cross-examination, Calcutta high court ruled while setting aside a trial court order, report Srishti Lakhotia and Dwaipayan Ghosh. The girl, then a minor, left home on Jan 29, 2023, and did not return, as per complaint lodged by her mother. When she was found, the girl informed that she was sold to a hotelier in Bengal for ‘commercial sex purposes’, her lawyer said. Six people were arrested and a chargesheet was filed under IPC and Pocso Act. The trial commenced after charges were framed on Dec 8, 2023. The survivor appeared for trial on Feb 27, 2024 and again on March 15, when she was cross-examined. Five months later, the lawyer representing one of the accused filed a plea on Aug 13, 2024, to recall her for further cross-examination. Pocso court allowed it. But HC invoked its powers under CrPC section 482 to scrap it, with Justice Chaitali Chatterjee Das saying the trial court had “passed the order without assigning any reason”. Reacting to the HC order, the survivor’s counsel said, “This is a win for the voiceless.”