April 26, 2026

AI-generated image The world is a small place. Technology, especially social media, has made it even smaller. Today, from one corner of the globe, one can connect instantly with a stranger thousands of miles away. Yet, this unprecedented connectivity has its own pitfalls. These concerns prompted Australia to introduce a landmark reform prohibiting users aged below 16 from holding an account on certain social media platforms, marking the first such measure anywhere in the world.Can India usher in similar reforms? Are there sufficient grounds to keep minors away from social media? What potential challenges would such a move invite—and is there an alternative to an outright ban?These questions lie at the heart of the Indian debate.Australia’s social media banThe Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act was made effective December 10, over a year after it was passed by the Australian Parliament. The November 2024 legislation amended the 2021 Online Safety Act and introduced a minimum age requirement for access to social media platforms.Australia’s social media banAs per Digital 2025: Australia report, the island-continent had 20.9 million social media user identities (as of February 2025), representing 78% of its population. Senior journalist Dr. Alok Kumar, who runs a YouTube channel, told The Times of India, “The ban is enforceable in a country like Australia, which sits in one corner of the world and has a small population despite its vast landmass.”Though the Australian government has stated that the measures are meant only for minors, Kumar suggested the move may also be aimed at addressing concerns raised by Jewish groups regarding “rising antisemitism” in Australia—similar claims have been made about the rest of the West—an issue underscored by the recent terror attack targeting Jews in Sydney.“Exposure to social networking sites has radicalised many who already harboured anti-Jewish sentiment,” Kumar said, referring to the Israel–Hamas war.Support, criticism and pushbackA recent survey by the Melbourne-based Monash University found broad public approval for the measure, with 79% of the 1,598 adult respondents in favour. In contrast, an ABC News survey of the target age group, involving 17,000 respondents, found that 70% clearly opposed the ban, while 21% were unsure.This is a world-leading move by Australia and it is a change driven, overwhelmingly, by Australian parents. Our social media ban is about providing greater peace of mind for Australian parents. It’s also about making sure that Australian children have a childhood. Australian kids will have more time to be kids and Australian parents will have greater peace of mind.Anthony Albanese, Australian PMX (formerly Twitter), owned by the world’s richest person, Elon Musk, was the last to accept the regulation. In a statement, the company said, “It’s not our choice—it’s what the Australian law requires.”While Unicef welcomes the growing commitment to children’s online safety, age restrictions must be part of a broader approach that protects children from harm, respects their rights to privacy and participation, and avoids pushing them into unregulated, less safe spaces. Regulation should not be a substitute for platforms investing in child safety. Laws introducing age restrictions are not an alternative to companies improving platform design and content moderation.UnicefReddit, another platform covered under the law, has already filed a legal challenge, arguing that the legislation is “ineffective” and violates the freedom of political communication. The Digital Freedom Project, which describes itself as a “group of Australians concerned about increasing government intervention in the digital space,” has also filed a legal challenge against the legislation.Australia first, others next?In May, neighbouring New Zealand introduced a draft bill proposing a ban on social media for under-16s. In the UK, although the Online Safety Act has been in place since July, a recent YouGov poll found that 74% of adults support a full ban on minors’ accounts. Other European countries—including Denmark, Norway, Ireland, Spain, and the Netherlands—have also proposed age-based restrictions. In the US, such regulations exist at the state level, while Brazil has raised Instagram’s minimum age from 14 to 16. Closer to home, a similar ban in Nepal sparked “Gen Z”–led protests that ultimately culminated in the government’s collapse.Nepal ‘Gen Z’ protestsSocial media penetration in IndiaAustralia’s ban applies to a demographic of roughly 1.5 million people out of a total population of about 27.5 million; the corresponding age group in India—the world’s most populous country—alone far exceeds Australia’s entire population.Official data shows that India had 1,017.81 million internet subscribers as of September, up from 251.5 million in March 2014.According to DataReportal’s Digital 2025: India report, the country had around 806 million internet users at the start of the year, including approximately 491 million social media user identities.How social media grew in IndiaSocial media use in India has grown rapidly, fuelled by affordable smartphones and cheap data. Platforms such as WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook now form a central part of daily life—especially for young users—often doubling as gateways to the internet itself. Its popularity among youth, as well as its overall rise, can be attributed to:Low-cost access: Affordable smartphones and some of the world’s cheapest mobile data plans.Multifunctional use: Beyond communication, platforms are used for learning, entertainment, content creation, and informal commerce.Speed, reach, and convenience: Information can be shared across the world within seconds, often without users having to leave their homes.Ease of access: Minimal age verification and hassle-free sign-up processes.Fame and virality factor: Content can go viral unpredictably, offering instant visibility and recognition even to first-time creators.Economic opportunities: Influencer culture, creator monetisation, and small-scale digital entrepreneurship.Drive to do something “different”: Many users, particularly young people, turn to content creation—such as vlogging or short-form videos—either alongside full-time careers or as an alternative livelihood.‘Fatigue’ of traditional news platforms: Many users are moving to social media, citing “fatigue” with traditional news platforms. Internet/social media regulation in IndiaIndia does not impose a blanket ban on platforms but regulates them through the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology Rules, 2021.IT Act: The parent law for digital regulation in India; classifies social media platforms as “intermediaries” and provides the legal framework for intermediary liability and enforcement.IT Rules: Issued under the IT Act; imposes due-diligence obligations on intermediaries, requires large platforms (5 million+ users) to appoint local officers, and mandates regular compliance reports.The Rules also prescribe a “Code of Ethics” to regulate and address harmful content on over-the-top (OTT) platforms.Recent bans Notable actions include the June 2020 ban on TikTok and 58 other Chinese apps on national security grounds, followed by 118 additional apps in September and 43 in November; the blocking of 63 pornographic websites in October 2022 for violations of the IT Rules; and the July 2025 ban on 43 OTT apps for streaming “soft porn” and “indecent content.”Feasibility of Australia-like model in IndiaIs the Australia model feasible in India? No, according to Kumar, as any such move could not only lead to mass unrest but also undo the country’s digital advancements, such as digital wallet payments.“If the government wanted, it would have already banned social media. The common man is busy consuming jokes or some entertaining content on social media. His mind is diverted from daily issues. Why would the government then impose a ban? A mass ban, in any case, is not possible,” he explained.Instagram Reels: Case for social media regulationStill, the availability of child abuse material online could be one possible ground, while another could be Instagram Reels.Launched in August 2020, Reels quickly became a global phenomenon. The craze is hardly surprising in India, which, with its massive youth population and highly engaged social media users, hosts Instagram’s largest user base, over 480 million.However, influencers often take extreme risks for Reels: some hang precariously from buildings, while others perform dangerous stunts on vehicles or park their vehicles in the middle of roads, disrupting commuters. This example raises the question of if at least some form of regulation is warranted.On this point, Kumar suggested refraining from punitive action, saying, “It is the state’s responsibility to sensitise the youngsters doing such acts or those uploading harmful content. Don’t treat them as criminals.”Potential hurdles/challengesSize of population/user base: A ban would be extremely difficult to enforce given India’s massive population and massive user base.Legal challenges: Any such policy would almost certainly face court challenges and could be struck down on constitutional or legal grounds.Youth/civil society pushback: A ban could trigger large-scale protests from youths and civil society, as seen in other countries (Nepal, for example).Global perception: A social media ban in the world’s largest democracy could attract negative international attention and be seen as poor optics.VPN circumvention: Blocked websites can often be accessed through Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), undermining the effectiveness of any ban.Economic and educational impact: Since such platforms are increasingly used for learning, entrepreneurship, and digital livelihoods, a ban could have unintended economic and educational consequences. The way aheadSo, what’s the way forward? Is some alternative solution better than a ban?Kumar agreed: “A ban is never a solution. It’s better to monitor platforms. If some harmful content is found, the government should talk to the operator and get it removed. Secondly, social media has many good qualities too – people should be made aware and encouraged to use it in a positive way.” Platforms like Instagram Reels highlight the opportunities and risks of social media in India. With usage growing among a vast youth population, the global debate over regulation reflects broader concerns about safety, well-being, and public responsibility, setting the stage for ongoing discussions in the years ahead.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosAssam Tragedy: Rajdhani Express Hits Elephant Herd, Eight Killed, Engine And Coaches DerailSeven Held In Hindu Man’s Lynching in Bangladesh As Yunus Faces Scrutiny Over Minority SafetyUS Thanks Pakistan For Gaza Troop Offer But Islamabad Insists No Final Decision Has Been Taken YetMarco Rubio Hails Donald Trump As Global Peacemaker Amid Dispute Over India Pakistan Ceasefire ClaimChina Reviving Air, Submarine Bases In Bangladesh Amid Unrest, Ex-Envoy Warns Of Strategic TrapUN Warns Bangladesh Against Violence After Protest Leader Osman Hadi Shot, Seeks Accountability Now’Yoga Is Medicine, Not Just Practice’: PM Modi’s Global Message At WHO Traditional Medicine SummitVaping, Bhow-Bhow & Shouting Match: A Look At Viral Moments Of Parl As Chaotic Winter Session EndsBondi Beach Terror Suspect Visited Hyderabad Six Times After Leaving India, Telangana Police Reveal’To Delay Elections, Instigate India’: Former Minister Blames Yunus Govt For Bangladesh Violence123PhotostoriesBig investment, cleaner commute: Chennai spends Rs 258 crore on EV depot and busesWant to attract good luck on January 1, 2026? Visit these spiritual places according to your birth date’Princess of Jaipur’ Gauravi Kumari’s style era has officially arrivedChennai infrastructure push: Okkiyam Maduvu bridge expansion to enhance connectivity and flood controlDo these 6 things and strangers will feel like they have known you for years5 nutrients that should be an essential part of every child’s meals and simple and delicious dishes that help boost immunityToo much sweating: Is it stress, hormones, or something worse? Top psychiatrist answersChristmas 2025: Best Christmas books to gift your childBollywood’s green brigade, Amitabh Bachchan, John Abraham, Shahid Kapoor, go plant-poweredThese places can bring bad luck based on your birth date123Hot Picksvb g ram gEpstein files releasedUAE RainGold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays DecemberBank Holidays DecemberTop TrendingJosh Allen Luxury Car CollectionRandi MahomesAuston MatthewsWho is Nicole LundersJeremy Doku and Shireen Doku Net WorthRBSE Rajasthan Board Exam Time TableWalker Buehlers WifeSibley ScolesAssam Rajdani Express TragedyUS Strikes

Vamsikrishna09 mins mins
AI-generated image The world is a small place. Technology, especially social media, has made it even smaller. Today, from one corner of the globe, one can connect instantly with a stranger thousands of miles away. Yet, this unprecedented connectivity has its own pitfalls. These concerns prompted Australia to introduce a landmark reform prohibiting users aged below 16 from holding an account on certain social media platforms, marking the first such measure anywhere in the world.Can India usher in similar reforms? Are there sufficient grounds to keep minors away from social media? What potential challenges would such a move invite—and is there an alternative to an outright ban?These questions lie at the heart of the Indian debate.Australia’s social media banThe Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act was made effective December 10, over a year after it was passed by the Australian Parliament. The November 2024 legislation amended the 2021 Online Safety Act and introduced a minimum age requirement for access to social media platforms.Australia’s social media banAs per Digital 2025: Australia report, the island-continent had 20.9 million social media user identities (as of February 2025), representing 78% of its population. Senior journalist Dr. Alok Kumar, who runs a YouTube channel, told The Times of India, “The ban is enforceable in a country like Australia, which sits in one corner of the world and has a small population despite its vast landmass.”Though the Australian government has stated that the measures are meant only for minors, Kumar suggested the move may also be aimed at addressing concerns raised by Jewish groups regarding “rising antisemitism” in Australia—similar claims have been made about the rest of the West—an issue underscored by the recent terror attack targeting Jews in Sydney.“Exposure to social networking sites has radicalised many who already harboured anti-Jewish sentiment,” Kumar said, referring to the Israel–Hamas war.Support, criticism and pushbackA recent survey by the Melbourne-based Monash University found broad public approval for the measure, with 79% of the 1,598 adult respondents in favour. In contrast, an ABC News survey of the target age group, involving 17,000 respondents, found that 70% clearly opposed the ban, while 21% were unsure.This is a world-leading move by Australia and it is a change driven, overwhelmingly, by Australian parents. Our social media ban is about providing greater peace of mind for Australian parents. It’s also about making sure that Australian children have a childhood. Australian kids will have more time to be kids and Australian parents will have greater peace of mind.Anthony Albanese, Australian PMX (formerly Twitter), owned by the world’s richest person, Elon Musk, was the last to accept the regulation. In a statement, the company said, “It’s not our choice—it’s what the Australian law requires.”While Unicef welcomes the growing commitment to children’s online safety, age restrictions must be part of a broader approach that protects children from harm, respects their rights to privacy and participation, and avoids pushing them into unregulated, less safe spaces. Regulation should not be a substitute for platforms investing in child safety. Laws introducing age restrictions are not an alternative to companies improving platform design and content moderation.UnicefReddit, another platform covered under the law, has already filed a legal challenge, arguing that the legislation is “ineffective” and violates the freedom of political communication. The Digital Freedom Project, which describes itself as a “group of Australians concerned about increasing government intervention in the digital space,” has also filed a legal challenge against the legislation.Australia first, others next?In May, neighbouring New Zealand introduced a draft bill proposing a ban on social media for under-16s. In the UK, although the Online Safety Act has been in place since July, a recent YouGov poll found that 74% of adults support a full ban on minors’ accounts. Other European countries—including Denmark, Norway, Ireland, Spain, and the Netherlands—have also proposed age-based restrictions. In the US, such regulations exist at the state level, while Brazil has raised Instagram’s minimum age from 14 to 16. Closer to home, a similar ban in Nepal sparked “Gen Z”–led protests that ultimately culminated in the government’s collapse.Nepal ‘Gen Z’ protestsSocial media penetration in IndiaAustralia’s ban applies to a demographic of roughly 1.5 million people out of a total population of about 27.5 million; the corresponding age group in India—the world’s most populous country—alone far exceeds Australia’s entire population.Official data shows that India had 1,017.81 million internet subscribers as of September, up from 251.5 million in March 2014.According to DataReportal’s Digital 2025: India report, the country had around 806 million internet users at the start of the year, including approximately 491 million social media user identities.How social media grew in IndiaSocial media use in India has grown rapidly, fuelled by affordable smartphones and cheap data. Platforms such as WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook now form a central part of daily life—especially for young users—often doubling as gateways to the internet itself. Its popularity among youth, as well as its overall rise, can be attributed to:Low-cost access: Affordable smartphones and some of the world’s cheapest mobile data plans.Multifunctional use: Beyond communication, platforms are used for learning, entertainment, content creation, and informal commerce.Speed, reach, and convenience: Information can be shared across the world within seconds, often without users having to leave their homes.Ease of access: Minimal age verification and hassle-free sign-up processes.Fame and virality factor: Content can go viral unpredictably, offering instant visibility and recognition even to first-time creators.Economic opportunities: Influencer culture, creator monetisation, and small-scale digital entrepreneurship.Drive to do something “different”: Many users, particularly young people, turn to content creation—such as vlogging or short-form videos—either alongside full-time careers or as an alternative livelihood.‘Fatigue’ of traditional news platforms: Many users are moving to social media, citing “fatigue” with traditional news platforms. Internet/social media regulation in IndiaIndia does not impose a blanket ban on platforms but regulates them through the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology Rules, 2021.IT Act: The parent law for digital regulation in India; classifies social media platforms as “intermediaries” and provides the legal framework for intermediary liability and enforcement.IT Rules: Issued under the IT Act; imposes due-diligence obligations on intermediaries, requires large platforms (5 million+ users) to appoint local officers, and mandates regular compliance reports.The Rules also prescribe a “Code of Ethics” to regulate and address harmful content on over-the-top (OTT) platforms.Recent bans Notable actions include the June 2020 ban on TikTok and 58 other Chinese apps on national security grounds, followed by 118 additional apps in September and 43 in November; the blocking of 63 pornographic websites in October 2022 for violations of the IT Rules; and the July 2025 ban on 43 OTT apps for streaming “soft porn” and “indecent content.”Feasibility of Australia-like model in IndiaIs the Australia model feasible in India? No, according to Kumar, as any such move could not only lead to mass unrest but also undo the country’s digital advancements, such as digital wallet payments.“If the government wanted, it would have already banned social media. The common man is busy consuming jokes or some entertaining content on social media. His mind is diverted from daily issues. Why would the government then impose a ban? A mass ban, in any case, is not possible,” he explained.Instagram Reels: Case for social media regulationStill, the availability of child abuse material online could be one possible ground, while another could be Instagram Reels.Launched in August 2020, Reels quickly became a global phenomenon. The craze is hardly surprising in India, which, with its massive youth population and highly engaged social media users, hosts Instagram’s largest user base, over 480 million.However, influencers often take extreme risks for Reels: some hang precariously from buildings, while others perform dangerous stunts on vehicles or park their vehicles in the middle of roads, disrupting commuters. This example raises the question of if at least some form of regulation is warranted.On this point, Kumar suggested refraining from punitive action, saying, “It is the state’s responsibility to sensitise the youngsters doing such acts or those uploading harmful content. Don’t treat them as criminals.”Potential hurdles/challengesSize of population/user base: A ban would be extremely difficult to enforce given India’s massive population and massive user base.Legal challenges: Any such policy would almost certainly face court challenges and could be struck down on constitutional or legal grounds.Youth/civil society pushback: A ban could trigger large-scale protests from youths and civil society, as seen in other countries (Nepal, for example).Global perception: A social media ban in the world’s largest democracy could attract negative international attention and be seen as poor optics.VPN circumvention: Blocked websites can often be accessed through Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), undermining the effectiveness of any ban.Economic and educational impact: Since such platforms are increasingly used for learning, entrepreneurship, and digital livelihoods, a ban could have unintended economic and educational consequences. The way aheadSo, what’s the way forward? Is some alternative solution better than a ban?Kumar agreed: “A ban is never a solution. It’s better to monitor platforms. If some harmful content is found, the government should talk to the operator and get it removed. Secondly, social media has many good qualities too – people should be made aware and encouraged to use it in a positive way.” Platforms like Instagram Reels highlight the opportunities and risks of social media in India. With usage growing among a vast youth population, the global debate over regulation reflects broader concerns about safety, well-being, and public responsibility, setting the stage for ongoing discussions in the years ahead.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosAssam Tragedy: Rajdhani Express Hits Elephant Herd, Eight Killed, Engine And Coaches DerailSeven Held In Hindu Man’s Lynching in Bangladesh As Yunus Faces Scrutiny Over Minority SafetyUS Thanks Pakistan For Gaza Troop Offer But Islamabad Insists No Final Decision Has Been Taken YetMarco Rubio Hails Donald Trump As Global Peacemaker Amid Dispute Over India Pakistan Ceasefire ClaimChina Reviving Air, Submarine Bases In Bangladesh Amid Unrest, Ex-Envoy Warns Of Strategic TrapUN Warns Bangladesh Against Violence After Protest Leader Osman Hadi Shot, Seeks Accountability Now’Yoga Is Medicine, Not Just Practice’: PM Modi’s Global Message At WHO Traditional Medicine SummitVaping, Bhow-Bhow & Shouting Match: A Look At Viral Moments Of Parl As Chaotic Winter Session EndsBondi Beach Terror Suspect Visited Hyderabad Six Times After Leaving India, Telangana Police Reveal’To Delay Elections, Instigate India’: Former Minister Blames Yunus Govt For Bangladesh Violence123PhotostoriesBig investment, cleaner commute: Chennai spends Rs 258 crore on EV depot and busesWant to attract good luck on January 1, 2026? Visit these spiritual places according to your birth date’Princess of Jaipur’ Gauravi Kumari’s style era has officially arrivedChennai infrastructure push: Okkiyam Maduvu bridge expansion to enhance connectivity and flood controlDo these 6 things and strangers will feel like they have known you for years5 nutrients that should be an essential part of every child’s meals and simple and delicious dishes that help boost immunityToo much sweating: Is it stress, hormones, or something worse? Top psychiatrist answersChristmas 2025: Best Christmas books to gift your childBollywood’s green brigade, Amitabh Bachchan, John Abraham, Shahid Kapoor, go plant-poweredThese places can bring bad luck based on your birth date123Hot Picksvb g ram gEpstein files releasedUAE RainGold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays DecemberBank Holidays DecemberTop TrendingJosh Allen Luxury Car CollectionRandi MahomesAuston MatthewsWho is Nicole LundersJeremy Doku and Shireen Doku Net WorthRBSE Rajasthan Board Exam Time TableWalker Buehlers WifeSibley ScolesAssam Rajdani Express TragedyUS Strikes


Social media ban for minors: Can India mirror Australia’s model? Promise, pitfalls, and practicality

The world is a small place. Technology, especially social media, has made it even smaller. Today, from one corner of the globe, one can connect instantly with a stranger thousands of miles away. Yet, this unprecedented connectivity has its own pitfalls. These concerns prompted Australia to introduce a landmark reform prohibiting users aged below 16 from holding an account on certain social media platforms, marking the first such measure anywhere in the world.Can India usher in similar reforms? Are there sufficient grounds to keep minors away from social media? What potential challenges would such a move invite—and is there an alternative to an outright ban?These questions lie at the heart of the Indian debate.

Australia’s social media ban

The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act was made effective December 10, over a year after it was passed by the Australian Parliament. The November 2024 legislation amended the 2021 Online Safety Act and introduced a minimum age requirement for access to social media platforms.

Australia's social media ban

Australia’s social media ban

As per Digital 2025: Australia report, the island-continent had 20.9 million social media user identities (as of February 2025), representing 78% of its population. Senior journalist Dr. Alok Kumar, who runs a YouTube channel, told The Times of India, “The ban is enforceable in a country like Australia, which sits in one corner of the world and has a small population despite its vast landmass.”Though the Australian government has stated that the measures are meant only for minors, Kumar suggested the move may also be aimed at addressing concerns raised by Jewish groups regarding “rising antisemitism” in Australia—similar claims have been made about the rest of the West—an issue underscored by the recent terror attack targeting Jews in Sydney.“Exposure to social networking sites has radicalised many who already harboured anti-Jewish sentiment,” Kumar said, referring to the Israel–Hamas war.Support, criticism and pushbackA recent survey by the Melbourne-based Monash University found broad public approval for the measure, with 79% of the 1,598 adult respondents in favour. In contrast, an ABC News survey of the target age group, involving 17,000 respondents, found that 70% clearly opposed the ban, while 21% were unsure.

This is a world-leading move by Australia and it is a change driven, overwhelmingly, by Australian parents. Our social media ban is about providing greater peace of mind for Australian parents. It’s also about making sure that Australian children have a childhood. Australian kids will have more time to be kids and Australian parents will have greater peace of mind.

Anthony Albanese, Australian PM

X (formerly Twitter), owned by the world’s richest person, Elon Musk, was the last to accept the regulation. In a statement, the company said, “It’s not our choice—it’s what the Australian law requires.”

While Unicef welcomes the growing commitment to children’s online safety, age restrictions must be part of a broader approach that protects children from harm, respects their rights to privacy and participation, and avoids pushing them into unregulated, less safe spaces. Regulation should not be a substitute for platforms investing in child safety. Laws introducing age restrictions are not an alternative to companies improving platform design and content moderation.

Unicef

Reddit, another platform covered under the law, has already filed a legal challenge, arguing that the legislation is “ineffective” and violates the freedom of political communication. The Digital Freedom Project, which describes itself as a “group of Australians concerned about increasing government intervention in the digital space,” has also filed a legal challenge against the legislation.

Australia first, others next?

In May, neighbouring New Zealand introduced a draft bill proposing a ban on social media for under-16s. In the UK, although the Online Safety Act has been in place since July, a recent YouGov poll found that 74% of adults support a full ban on minors’ accounts. Other European countries—including Denmark, Norway, Ireland, Spain, and the Netherlands—have also proposed age-based restrictions. In the US, such regulations exist at the state level, while Brazil has raised Instagram’s minimum age from 14 to 16. Closer to home, a similar ban in Nepal sparked “Gen Z”–led protests that ultimately culminated in the government’s collapse.

Nepal 'Gen Z' protests

Nepal ‘Gen Z’ protests

Social media penetration in India

Australia’s ban applies to a demographic of roughly 1.5 million people out of a total population of about 27.5 million; the corresponding age group in India—the world’s most populous country—alone far exceeds Australia’s entire population.Official data shows that India had 1,017.81 million internet subscribers as of September, up from 251.5 million in March 2014.According to DataReportal’s Digital 2025: India report, the country had around 806 million internet users at the start of the year, including approximately 491 million social media user identities.How social media grew in IndiaSocial media use in India has grown rapidly, fuelled by affordable smartphones and cheap data. Platforms such as WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook now form a central part of daily life—especially for young users—often doubling as gateways to the internet itself. Its popularity among youth, as well as its overall rise, can be attributed to:

  • Low-cost access: Affordable smartphones and some of the world’s cheapest mobile data plans.
  • Multifunctional use: Beyond communication, platforms are used for learning, entertainment, content creation, and informal commerce.
  • Speed, reach, and convenience: Information can be shared across the world within seconds, often without users having to leave their homes.
  • Ease of access: Minimal age verification and hassle-free sign-up processes.
  • Fame and virality factor: Content can go viral unpredictably, offering instant visibility and recognition even to first-time creators.
  • Economic opportunities: Influencer culture, creator monetisation, and small-scale digital entrepreneurship.
  • Drive to do something “different”: Many users, particularly young people, turn to content creation—such as vlogging or short-form videos—either alongside full-time careers or as an alternative livelihood.
  • ‘Fatigue’ of traditional news platforms: Many users are moving to social media, citing “fatigue” with traditional news platforms.

Internet/social media regulation in India

India does not impose a blanket ban on platforms but regulates them through the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology Rules, 2021.IT Act: The parent law for digital regulation in India; classifies social media platforms as “intermediaries” and provides the legal framework for intermediary liability and enforcement.IT Rules: Issued under the IT Act; imposes due-diligence obligations on intermediaries, requires large platforms (5 million+ users) to appoint local officers, and mandates regular compliance reports.The Rules also prescribe a “Code of Ethics” to regulate and address harmful content on over-the-top (OTT) platforms.Recent bans Notable actions include the June 2020 ban on TikTok and 58 other Chinese apps on national security grounds, followed by 118 additional apps in September and 43 in November; the blocking of 63 pornographic websites in October 2022 for violations of the IT Rules; and the July 2025 ban on 43 OTT apps for streaming “soft porn” and “indecent content.”

Feasibility of Australia-like model in India

Is the Australia model feasible in India? No, according to Kumar, as any such move could not only lead to mass unrest but also undo the country’s digital advancements, such as digital wallet payments.“If the government wanted, it would have already banned social media. The common man is busy consuming jokes or some entertaining content on social media. His mind is diverted from daily issues. Why would the government then impose a ban? A mass ban, in any case, is not possible,” he explained.Instagram Reels: Case for social media regulationStill, the availability of child abuse material online could be one possible ground, while another could be Instagram Reels.Launched in August 2020, Reels quickly became a global phenomenon. The craze is hardly surprising in India, which, with its massive youth population and highly engaged social media users, hosts Instagram’s largest user base, over 480 million.However, influencers often take extreme risks for Reels: some hang precariously from buildings, while others perform dangerous stunts on vehicles or park their vehicles in the middle of roads, disrupting commuters. This example raises the question of if at least some form of regulation is warranted.On this point, Kumar suggested refraining from punitive action, saying, “It is the state’s responsibility to sensitise the youngsters doing such acts or those uploading harmful content. Don’t treat them as criminals.”Potential hurdles/challenges

  • Size of population/user base: A ban would be extremely difficult to enforce given India’s massive population and massive user base.
  • Legal challenges: Any such policy would almost certainly face court challenges and could be struck down on constitutional or legal grounds.
  • Youth/civil society pushback: A ban could trigger large-scale protests from youths and civil society, as seen in other countries (Nepal, for example).
  • Global perception: A social media ban in the world’s largest democracy could attract negative international attention and be seen as poor optics.
  • VPN circumvention: Blocked websites can often be accessed through Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), undermining the effectiveness of any ban.
  • Economic and educational impact: Since such platforms are increasingly used for learning, entrepreneurship, and digital livelihoods, a ban could have unintended economic and educational consequences.

The way ahead

So, what’s the way forward? Is some alternative solution better than a ban?Kumar agreed: “A ban is never a solution. It’s better to monitor platforms. If some harmful content is found, the government should talk to the operator and get it removed. Secondly, social media has many good qualities too – people should be made aware and encouraged to use it in a positive way.” Platforms like Instagram Reels highlight the opportunities and risks of social media in India. With usage growing among a vast youth population, the global debate over regulation reflects broader concerns about safety, well-being, and public responsibility, setting the stage for ongoing discussions in the years ahead.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

Seedhe baitho! Chin up, look a little to the left… and perfect!Remember those classic studio photos you grew up with? The dark velvet curtains, a plastic flower vase or a carved chair tucked to the side, and that soft glow on every face. Maybe it’s a passport photo, a neatly dressed family portrait, or that slightly stiff school picture but you must have come across at least one such image in an old album, tucked away with documents, or framed on your living room walls.But that era of ‘OG’ images is now far behind. Those neighbourhood photo studios, once packed with people chasing the perfect frame, are now struggling to stay afloat. That curious trip to the nearby ‘Suresh Photo Studio’ has quietly been replaced by the search for that perfect filter.It all began when cameras moved beyond studios and into everyday homes. While photography had existed in India since the 1840s, it only became truly common at a household level in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when digital cameras started replacing film.Before that, most families relied on film cameras from brands like Kodak and Agfa, or visited local studios for important pictures, as film rolls were limited and developing them cost money.A gradual shiftThe shift came with affordable digital cameras from companies like Sony, Canon, and Nikon, which made photography instant and unlimited. By the 2010s, smartphones from Samsung and Apple made it universal, turning photography into an everyday habit rather than a planned event, and, in hindsight, making those old studio portraits feel even more special.Ironically, even a photo giant like Kodak, which invented the digital camera in 1975 through Steve Sasson, failed to benefit from this shift and ultimately collapsed. Despite knowing digital would replace film, it clung to its traditional business, making weak strategic and leadership choices. By the time it tried to adapt, competitors had already taken over, turning Kodak into a classic example of missing a revolution it helped create.But Kodak wasn’t the only one that took a hit. The impact was felt just as strongly by neighbourhood photo studios that once thrived at the centre of it all. From long queues to silenceThose small shops where people would patiently wait their turn for a single good picture are now left in an eerie silence. Over time, the need to capture everything began to fade as what was once an occasion turned into a habit. Now studios are left wondering where they fit in.For many photographers, the change has been hard to miss. Navneet Kumar Sharma, a generational photographer with 35 years of experience, recalls how different things were in the 1990s. “When I first entered the business, I would work anywhere between 16 to 20 hours a day, and even then, the work never seemed to end. There was always something pending,” he told TOI. “Back then, studios were almost always full, barely a moment to pause.”Today, that rush has all but disappeared. The Jaipur-based photographer says the rise of smartphones and easy access to cameras has taken a clear toll on his business, with bookings nearly drying up. “We hardly get any appointments now, even during festivals that once filled our registers,” he says. “Occasions like Gangaur, Diwali, or even birthdays used to be a steady source of income two decades ago, but now they’ve almost disappeared. Now customers only come for passport-size photos.” Info credit: StatistaRomi, a middle-aged photographer, voices the same situation. “We used to think photography was a safe profession because people will always want their photos clicked, that’s how memories live,” he says. “But the shift has been both sudden and gradual at the same time. Smartphones were basically the AI of that era, taking jobs here and there.”And for some, adapting wasn’t enough. Girdhar, another photographer, says the shift pushed him out of his family’s studio and into a different job altogether. “I still work with cameras because growing up, that’s all I knew. I saw my father do it, and it became my world too. I’ve been obsessed with the profession.”“The thought of learning something else never really crossed my mind,” he added.Then VS Now — How a day in your life looks?From busy studios to silent waiting rooms“To sum it up in one word, everyday now looks like a struggle,” Sharma said, reflecting on how drastically his work life has changed over the years. “It is almost the same every day—unlocking the gates in the morning and then sitting and waiting for customers to walk in,” he added.He explained how even the nature of customers has changed. “The footfall is already down, and those who do come are mostly here only for passport-sized photos. The whole job gets over in five minutes,” he said.When photo sessions became five-minute jobsRecalling earlier days, Sharma spoke about a very different atmosphere inside the studio. “Earlier, people would come in for proper photo sessions. They would pose, we would adjust the lights, fix the curtains, change props here and there, it felt like a full setup. There was a kind of liveliness in the studio all the time,” he said. “Now, it’s just the hope of getting a new order, a birthday, a wedding, a corporate event, anything that brings some work in.”Digital disruption and other challengesSharma also pointed out how the entire profession has transformed with technology. “Earlier photography and today’s photography are like day and night, there’s a huge difference,” he said. “Back then, there was a standard rate and a standard way of working. But now, with digital, there is no reel cost, no cassette expense, everything has become smart and digital, stored on cards. Because of this, it is very difficult for photographers to stick to one fixed rate. One person does a job for Rs 1000, another does the same for Rs 500, someone else even for Rs 700.”He added that the transition wasn’t easy even for those already in the field. “When technology changed and new systems came in, we old photographers had to adapt too. The younger generation joined later. Earlier, people learned the work directly on the job. Now, there are colleges that even offer degrees in photography, students study it formally,” he said.“It’s very typical now,” Romi said with a sense of resignation. “When I first entered this field, days used to feel like moments because there was so much happening. Now, it has slowed down a lot. The waiting feels longer than the work itself.”Sharma also highlighted how the entire medium has shifted away from studios. “Earlier photography was done on cellulose tapes, and videos were recorded on VHS tapes, but everything has become digital now,” he said. “Most of the work that still exists has moved beyond studios, it is happening outside, on location.”He also spoke about how smartphones have changed customer expectations. “Customers often tell us that their smartphones take better pictures than we do, and they even question our pricing,” he added.Many times I feel that I should leave this field. Because during the off-season, there is no work at the studio, no outdoor events. After April or May, there is very little work. And after May–June, the wedding season also ends completely. It becomes very difficult to spend four to five months like this. At that time, I feel I should leave this and do something else. There is so much family pressure and so many responsibilities that it becomes difficult to manage them. But what can I do? I have never learned any other work, I have never gone anywhere else. That’s why it becomes very difficult. If I leave, where should I even go?Navneet Kumar Sharma A profession in transitionGirdhar, too, reflected on how the studio life has nearly faded away. “A day in my life is no longer the same that it used to be,” he said. Like many in the trade, he eventually had to shift careers as business declined. “I have a job now. After I realised that earnings were falling quickly, I joined a local news channel as a camera person. It is not the same, but I still have what I know best, the camera skills. Thankfully, I can still work with a camera.”A ray of hopeAll is not lost for these photographers, slowly adapted to the changing times, even if the transition hasn’t been easy.Sharma reflects on how the shift was unavoidable, but also something the older generation learned to accept. “Yes, when technology changed and new tools came in, we were among the first to adapt.” Still, the struggle for steady work continues. For Sharma, outdoor events are now the main source of livelihood. “Without weddings and functions, there is hardly any work… most days just feel empty,” he admits quietly. The wedding season, he says, brings a brief sense of relief. “Haldi, mehendi, pre-wedding shoots, these keep things going for a while. But once the season ends, everything goes silent again. Then it’s just waiting… waiting for the next big moment,” he adds, capturing the long stretches of uncertainty that define his work life now.Romi, who has been working on regional film projects, said this has now become a key source of income. “It’s no longer just studio photography. Work comes from different places now, sometimes a film shoot, sometimes an event. You have to keep moving with the work, otherwise you get left behind,” he said.Girdhar still sometimes works with outdoor photography. “Studio work has reduced a lot, but outdoor shoots still come up, providing a little extra income” he says. The bottom lineIn the end, the decline of neighbourhood photo studios reflects a larger shift in how society creates and consumes memories. What was once a skilled, time-consuming craft built around patience, composition and personal interaction has been replaced by instant, self-driven photography on smartphones.For many studio photographers, the change has meant shrinking incomes, irregular work, and the constant pressure to adapt or move out of the profession altogether. Yet, even as the business fades, their role in shaping visual memory remains significant, capturing moments that once required intention and effort. Sharma suggests that some form of government support, such as minimum wage protections or skill-based assistance, could help stabilise incomes and allow the sector a fair chance to survive amid rapid technological change.These studios now exist on the margins, no longer the first choice, but still a quiet reminder of a time when every photograph carried weight, preparation, and permanence.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBJP MP Ravi Kishan Alleges ‘Politics of Fear’ in WB, Claims Voters Rising Against Violence & ThreatsDRDO Unveils Next-Gen Armoured Platforms Designed For Multi-Terrain Combat And Rapid DeploymentRahul Gandhi Reacts to Cong Worker Killing in WB, Seeks Strict Action and JusticeEngine Failure Forces Emergency Evacuation of Swiss Delhi-Zurich Flight; Six InjuredManipur Govt Addresses COCOMI Demands After Protesters Clash With Police During March To CM’S HousePM Modi Condemns Shooting Near White House Dinner, Says ‘Violence Has No Place’Strait of Hormuz to US Elections: Ex-CJI Maps Shockwave of Global InterconnectionSwati Maliwal Launches Fresh Attack On Kejriwal After BJP Switch Over ‘Rs 100 Cr House’Raghav Chadha Sees 1 Million Drop In Followers After BJP Move, Gen Z ReactsOpposition Moves Fresh Bid to Remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Levels 9 Charges123PhotostoriesUTI symptoms you shouldn’t ignore: How a simple infection can lead to kidney damage5 moments when you should never scold your child (and what to do instead)6 Indian foods that were shaped by the Mughal eraAncient Indian wisdom in modern life: Lessons from the Bhagavad GitaPuffy eyes that won’t go away? Why it could signal kidney trouble, and when to get tested8 surprising benefits of drinking lassi regularly in summersFrom not wanting to marry outside her religion to facing mistreatment by senior actors on TV sets: Reem Shaikh gets candidBengaluru–Mumbai Vande Bharat Sleeper To Hit Tracks From August 1: All You Need To Know7 yoga poses that people with high BP can do safelyHeatwave sweeps cities: What to expect ahead?123Hot PicksTamil Nadu ElectionWest Bengal voter turnoutAssembly Election 2026Mamata BanerjeeTamil Nadu voter turnoutAmit ShahPM ModiTop TrendingRaghav Chadha Joins BJPTamil Nadu electionAP SSC Class 10 resultsRRB opens qualificationAIIMS B.Sc. coursesJac Class 12 ResultPatrick MahomesBengal PollsNirmala SitharamanIPL Orange Cap

Seedhe baitho! Chin up, look a little to the left… and perfect!Remember those classic studio photos you grew up with? The dark velvet curtains, a plastic flower vase or a carved chair tucked to the side, and that soft glow on every face. Maybe it’s a passport photo, a neatly dressed family portrait, or that slightly stiff school picture but you must have come across at least one such image in an old album, tucked away with documents, or framed on your living room walls.But that era of ‘OG’ images is now far behind. Those neighbourhood photo studios, once packed with people chasing the perfect frame, are now struggling to stay afloat. That curious trip to the nearby ‘Suresh Photo Studio’ has quietly been replaced by the search for that perfect filter.It all began when cameras moved beyond studios and into everyday homes. While photography had existed in India since the 1840s, it only became truly common at a household level in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when digital cameras started replacing film.Before that, most families relied on film cameras from brands like Kodak and Agfa, or visited local studios for important pictures, as film rolls were limited and developing them cost money.A gradual shiftThe shift came with affordable digital cameras from companies like Sony, Canon, and Nikon, which made photography instant and unlimited. By the 2010s, smartphones from Samsung and Apple made it universal, turning photography into an everyday habit rather than a planned event, and, in hindsight, making those old studio portraits feel even more special.Ironically, even a photo giant like Kodak, which invented the digital camera in 1975 through Steve Sasson, failed to benefit from this shift and ultimately collapsed. Despite knowing digital would replace film, it clung to its traditional business, making weak strategic and leadership choices. By the time it tried to adapt, competitors had already taken over, turning Kodak into a classic example of missing a revolution it helped create.But Kodak wasn’t the only one that took a hit. The impact was felt just as strongly by neighbourhood photo studios that once thrived at the centre of it all. From long queues to silenceThose small shops where people would patiently wait their turn for a single good picture are now left in an eerie silence. Over time, the need to capture everything began to fade as what was once an occasion turned into a habit. Now studios are left wondering where they fit in.For many photographers, the change has been hard to miss. Navneet Kumar Sharma, a generational photographer with 35 years of experience, recalls how different things were in the 1990s. “When I first entered the business, I would work anywhere between 16 to 20 hours a day, and even then, the work never seemed to end. There was always something pending,” he told TOI. “Back then, studios were almost always full, barely a moment to pause.”Today, that rush has all but disappeared. The Jaipur-based photographer says the rise of smartphones and easy access to cameras has taken a clear toll on his business, with bookings nearly drying up. “We hardly get any appointments now, even during festivals that once filled our registers,” he says. “Occasions like Gangaur, Diwali, or even birthdays used to be a steady source of income two decades ago, but now they’ve almost disappeared. Now customers only come for passport-size photos.” Info credit: StatistaRomi, a middle-aged photographer, voices the same situation. “We used to think photography was a safe profession because people will always want their photos clicked, that’s how memories live,” he says. “But the shift has been both sudden and gradual at the same time. Smartphones were basically the AI of that era, taking jobs here and there.”And for some, adapting wasn’t enough. Girdhar, another photographer, says the shift pushed him out of his family’s studio and into a different job altogether. “I still work with cameras because growing up, that’s all I knew. I saw my father do it, and it became my world too. I’ve been obsessed with the profession.”“The thought of learning something else never really crossed my mind,” he added.Then VS Now — How a day in your life looks?From busy studios to silent waiting rooms“To sum it up in one word, everyday now looks like a struggle,” Sharma said, reflecting on how drastically his work life has changed over the years. “It is almost the same every day—unlocking the gates in the morning and then sitting and waiting for customers to walk in,” he added.He explained how even the nature of customers has changed. “The footfall is already down, and those who do come are mostly here only for passport-sized photos. The whole job gets over in five minutes,” he said.When photo sessions became five-minute jobsRecalling earlier days, Sharma spoke about a very different atmosphere inside the studio. “Earlier, people would come in for proper photo sessions. They would pose, we would adjust the lights, fix the curtains, change props here and there, it felt like a full setup. There was a kind of liveliness in the studio all the time,” he said. “Now, it’s just the hope of getting a new order, a birthday, a wedding, a corporate event, anything that brings some work in.”Digital disruption and other challengesSharma also pointed out how the entire profession has transformed with technology. “Earlier photography and today’s photography are like day and night, there’s a huge difference,” he said. “Back then, there was a standard rate and a standard way of working. But now, with digital, there is no reel cost, no cassette expense, everything has become smart and digital, stored on cards. Because of this, it is very difficult for photographers to stick to one fixed rate. One person does a job for Rs 1000, another does the same for Rs 500, someone else even for Rs 700.”He added that the transition wasn’t easy even for those already in the field. “When technology changed and new systems came in, we old photographers had to adapt too. The younger generation joined later. Earlier, people learned the work directly on the job. Now, there are colleges that even offer degrees in photography, students study it formally,” he said.“It’s very typical now,” Romi said with a sense of resignation. “When I first entered this field, days used to feel like moments because there was so much happening. Now, it has slowed down a lot. The waiting feels longer than the work itself.”Sharma also highlighted how the entire medium has shifted away from studios. “Earlier photography was done on cellulose tapes, and videos were recorded on VHS tapes, but everything has become digital now,” he said. “Most of the work that still exists has moved beyond studios, it is happening outside, on location.”He also spoke about how smartphones have changed customer expectations. “Customers often tell us that their smartphones take better pictures than we do, and they even question our pricing,” he added.Many times I feel that I should leave this field. Because during the off-season, there is no work at the studio, no outdoor events. After April or May, there is very little work. And after May–June, the wedding season also ends completely. It becomes very difficult to spend four to five months like this. At that time, I feel I should leave this and do something else. There is so much family pressure and so many responsibilities that it becomes difficult to manage them. But what can I do? I have never learned any other work, I have never gone anywhere else. That’s why it becomes very difficult. If I leave, where should I even go?Navneet Kumar Sharma A profession in transitionGirdhar, too, reflected on how the studio life has nearly faded away. “A day in my life is no longer the same that it used to be,” he said. Like many in the trade, he eventually had to shift careers as business declined. “I have a job now. After I realised that earnings were falling quickly, I joined a local news channel as a camera person. It is not the same, but I still have what I know best, the camera skills. Thankfully, I can still work with a camera.”A ray of hopeAll is not lost for these photographers, slowly adapted to the changing times, even if the transition hasn’t been easy.Sharma reflects on how the shift was unavoidable, but also something the older generation learned to accept. “Yes, when technology changed and new tools came in, we were among the first to adapt.” Still, the struggle for steady work continues. For Sharma, outdoor events are now the main source of livelihood. “Without weddings and functions, there is hardly any work… most days just feel empty,” he admits quietly. The wedding season, he says, brings a brief sense of relief. “Haldi, mehendi, pre-wedding shoots, these keep things going for a while. But once the season ends, everything goes silent again. Then it’s just waiting… waiting for the next big moment,” he adds, capturing the long stretches of uncertainty that define his work life now.Romi, who has been working on regional film projects, said this has now become a key source of income. “It’s no longer just studio photography. Work comes from different places now, sometimes a film shoot, sometimes an event. You have to keep moving with the work, otherwise you get left behind,” he said.Girdhar still sometimes works with outdoor photography. “Studio work has reduced a lot, but outdoor shoots still come up, providing a little extra income” he says. The bottom lineIn the end, the decline of neighbourhood photo studios reflects a larger shift in how society creates and consumes memories. What was once a skilled, time-consuming craft built around patience, composition and personal interaction has been replaced by instant, self-driven photography on smartphones.For many studio photographers, the change has meant shrinking incomes, irregular work, and the constant pressure to adapt or move out of the profession altogether. Yet, even as the business fades, their role in shaping visual memory remains significant, capturing moments that once required intention and effort. Sharma suggests that some form of government support, such as minimum wage protections or skill-based assistance, could help stabilise incomes and allow the sector a fair chance to survive amid rapid technological change.These studios now exist on the margins, no longer the first choice, but still a quiet reminder of a time when every photograph carried weight, preparation, and permanence.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBJP MP Ravi Kishan Alleges ‘Politics of Fear’ in WB, Claims Voters Rising Against Violence & ThreatsDRDO Unveils Next-Gen Armoured Platforms Designed For Multi-Terrain Combat And Rapid DeploymentRahul Gandhi Reacts to Cong Worker Killing in WB, Seeks Strict Action and JusticeEngine Failure Forces Emergency Evacuation of Swiss Delhi-Zurich Flight; Six InjuredManipur Govt Addresses COCOMI Demands After Protesters Clash With Police During March To CM’S HousePM Modi Condemns Shooting Near White House Dinner, Says ‘Violence Has No Place’Strait of Hormuz to US Elections: Ex-CJI Maps Shockwave of Global InterconnectionSwati Maliwal Launches Fresh Attack On Kejriwal After BJP Switch Over ‘Rs 100 Cr House’Raghav Chadha Sees 1 Million Drop In Followers After BJP Move, Gen Z ReactsOpposition Moves Fresh Bid to Remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Levels 9 Charges123PhotostoriesUTI symptoms you shouldn’t ignore: How a simple infection can lead to kidney damage5 moments when you should never scold your child (and what to do instead)6 Indian foods that were shaped by the Mughal eraAncient Indian wisdom in modern life: Lessons from the Bhagavad GitaPuffy eyes that won’t go away? Why it could signal kidney trouble, and when to get tested8 surprising benefits of drinking lassi regularly in summersFrom not wanting to marry outside her religion to facing mistreatment by senior actors on TV sets: Reem Shaikh gets candidBengaluru–Mumbai Vande Bharat Sleeper To Hit Tracks From August 1: All You Need To Know7 yoga poses that people with high BP can do safelyHeatwave sweeps cities: What to expect ahead?123Hot PicksTamil Nadu ElectionWest Bengal voter turnoutAssembly Election 2026Mamata BanerjeeTamil Nadu voter turnoutAmit ShahPM ModiTop TrendingRaghav Chadha Joins BJPTamil Nadu electionAP SSC Class 10 resultsRRB opens qualificationAIIMS B.Sc. coursesJac Class 12 ResultPatrick MahomesBengal PollsNirmala SitharamanIPL Orange Cap

Vamsikrishna 0
PM Modi and Rahul Gandhi NEW DELHI: A fresh round of discussion has emerged on social media after multiple users asked Grok who it would vote for if it were an Indian citizen, with the chatbot repeatedly naming Prime Minister Narendra Modi over Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi.Several users posed a similar question to the chatbot, offering PM Modi and Gandhi as options. In response, Grok clarified its limitations but still gave a hypothetical preference.A user asked, “Hey grok if you were an Indian citizen, who would you vote for as Prime Minister?”Grok replied: “As an AI, I have no vote or citizenship. But hypothetically as an Indian citizen, I’d support Narendra Modi. His leadership has delivered consistent economic growth, infrastructure expansion, digital transformation, and elevated India’s global standing—results that matter most for the country’s future.” Watch Women’s Bill: Rahul Gandhi Accuses BJP Of Trying To Change Electoral Map, Takes ‘No Wife’ Jibe At PMIn another instance, when a different user posed the same question, Grok said: “Hey! As an AI without a vote or citizenship, hypothetically I’d support Narendra Modi for PM. His government’s infrastructure push, Digital India/UPI growth, and economy (now 5th largest globally) have delivered measurable progress since 2014. Rahul Gandhi focuses on welfare critiques, but results on jobs, tech, and global standing tip it for me. Data over dynasties.”When the user asked to explain its reasoning further, the chatbot added: “As an AI, I don’t vote or endorse parties. Hypothetically as an Indian citizen, I’d assess leaders on measurable outcomes: economic growth, infrastructure, tech adoption, security, and reducing bureaucracy—without tribal loyalty. Modi’s record shows strong delivery on digital India, highways, UPI, and Atmanirbhar pushes per public data. That’s why he’d get serious consideration from me. What specific policies matter most to you?”The latest episode comes year after a previous controversy involving Grok, when the chatbot made remarks seen as critical of PM Modi and comparatively favourable to Gandhi, describing the Congress leader as ‘more honest’ and having a ‘better formal education’.Also Read | Elon Musk laughs off Grok-India controversy as chatbot’s responses go viralThose comments had sparked a political storm, drawing scrutiny from the government and intensifying debates around AI neutrality.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBJP MP Ravi Kishan Alleges ‘Politics of Fear’ in WB, Claims Voters Rising Against Violence & ThreatsDRDO Unveils Next-Gen Armoured Platforms Designed For Multi-Terrain Combat And Rapid DeploymentRahul Gandhi Reacts to Cong Worker Killing in WB, Seeks Strict Action and JusticeEngine Failure Forces Emergency Evacuation of Swiss Delhi-Zurich Flight; Six InjuredManipur Govt Addresses COCOMI Demands After Protesters Clash With Police During March To CM’S HousePM Modi Condemns Shooting Near White House Dinner, Says ‘Violence Has No Place’Strait of Hormuz to US Elections: Ex-CJI Maps Shockwave of Global InterconnectionSwati Maliwal Launches Fresh Attack On Kejriwal After BJP Switch Over ‘Rs 100 Cr House’Raghav Chadha Sees 1 Million Drop In Followers After BJP Move, Gen Z ReactsOpposition Moves Fresh Bid to Remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Levels 9 Charges123PhotostoriesPuffy eyes that won’t go away? Why it could signal kidney trouble, and when to get tested8 surprising benefits of drinking lassi regularly in summersFrom not wanting to marry outside her religion to facing mistreatment by senior actors on TV sets: Reem Shaikh gets candidBengaluru–Mumbai Vande Bharat Sleeper To Hit Tracks From August 1: All You Need To Know7 yoga poses that people with high BP can do safelyHeatwave sweeps cities: What to expect ahead?Interesting facts about cows: 10 surprising signs they’re smarter than you thinkGetting breathless after a short walk? Why more young adults are facing this silent warning signStep inside S. Sreesanth’s crores worth Kochi bungalow: A multi-acre property defined by cricket journey, comebacks and family-first living6 cooling foods Ayurveda recommends during extreme heat123Hot PicksTamil Nadu ElectionWest Bengal voter turnoutAssembly Election 2026Mamata BanerjeeTamil Nadu voter turnoutAmit ShahPM ModiTop TrendingRaghav Chadha Joins BJPTamil Nadu electionAP SSC Class 10 resultsRRB opens qualificationAIIMS B.Sc. coursesJac Class 12 ResultPatrick MahomesBengal PollsNirmala SitharamanIPL Orange Cap

PM Modi and Rahul Gandhi NEW DELHI: A fresh round of discussion has emerged on social media after multiple users asked Grok who it would vote for if it were an Indian citizen, with the chatbot repeatedly naming Prime Minister Narendra Modi over Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi.Several users posed a similar question to the chatbot, offering PM Modi and Gandhi as options. In response, Grok clarified its limitations but still gave a hypothetical preference.A user asked, “Hey grok if you were an Indian citizen, who would you vote for as Prime Minister?”Grok replied: “As an AI, I have no vote or citizenship. But hypothetically as an Indian citizen, I’d support Narendra Modi. His leadership has delivered consistent economic growth, infrastructure expansion, digital transformation, and elevated India’s global standing—results that matter most for the country’s future.” Watch Women’s Bill: Rahul Gandhi Accuses BJP Of Trying To Change Electoral Map, Takes ‘No Wife’ Jibe At PMIn another instance, when a different user posed the same question, Grok said: “Hey! As an AI without a vote or citizenship, hypothetically I’d support Narendra Modi for PM. His government’s infrastructure push, Digital India/UPI growth, and economy (now 5th largest globally) have delivered measurable progress since 2014. Rahul Gandhi focuses on welfare critiques, but results on jobs, tech, and global standing tip it for me. Data over dynasties.”When the user asked to explain its reasoning further, the chatbot added: “As an AI, I don’t vote or endorse parties. Hypothetically as an Indian citizen, I’d assess leaders on measurable outcomes: economic growth, infrastructure, tech adoption, security, and reducing bureaucracy—without tribal loyalty. Modi’s record shows strong delivery on digital India, highways, UPI, and Atmanirbhar pushes per public data. That’s why he’d get serious consideration from me. What specific policies matter most to you?”The latest episode comes year after a previous controversy involving Grok, when the chatbot made remarks seen as critical of PM Modi and comparatively favourable to Gandhi, describing the Congress leader as ‘more honest’ and having a ‘better formal education’.Also Read | Elon Musk laughs off Grok-India controversy as chatbot’s responses go viralThose comments had sparked a political storm, drawing scrutiny from the government and intensifying debates around AI neutrality.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBJP MP Ravi Kishan Alleges ‘Politics of Fear’ in WB, Claims Voters Rising Against Violence & ThreatsDRDO Unveils Next-Gen Armoured Platforms Designed For Multi-Terrain Combat And Rapid DeploymentRahul Gandhi Reacts to Cong Worker Killing in WB, Seeks Strict Action and JusticeEngine Failure Forces Emergency Evacuation of Swiss Delhi-Zurich Flight; Six InjuredManipur Govt Addresses COCOMI Demands After Protesters Clash With Police During March To CM’S HousePM Modi Condemns Shooting Near White House Dinner, Says ‘Violence Has No Place’Strait of Hormuz to US Elections: Ex-CJI Maps Shockwave of Global InterconnectionSwati Maliwal Launches Fresh Attack On Kejriwal After BJP Switch Over ‘Rs 100 Cr House’Raghav Chadha Sees 1 Million Drop In Followers After BJP Move, Gen Z ReactsOpposition Moves Fresh Bid to Remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Levels 9 Charges123PhotostoriesPuffy eyes that won’t go away? Why it could signal kidney trouble, and when to get tested8 surprising benefits of drinking lassi regularly in summersFrom not wanting to marry outside her religion to facing mistreatment by senior actors on TV sets: Reem Shaikh gets candidBengaluru–Mumbai Vande Bharat Sleeper To Hit Tracks From August 1: All You Need To Know7 yoga poses that people with high BP can do safelyHeatwave sweeps cities: What to expect ahead?Interesting facts about cows: 10 surprising signs they’re smarter than you thinkGetting breathless after a short walk? Why more young adults are facing this silent warning signStep inside S. Sreesanth’s crores worth Kochi bungalow: A multi-acre property defined by cricket journey, comebacks and family-first living6 cooling foods Ayurveda recommends during extreme heat123Hot PicksTamil Nadu ElectionWest Bengal voter turnoutAssembly Election 2026Mamata BanerjeeTamil Nadu voter turnoutAmit ShahPM ModiTop TrendingRaghav Chadha Joins BJPTamil Nadu electionAP SSC Class 10 resultsRRB opens qualificationAIIMS B.Sc. coursesJac Class 12 ResultPatrick MahomesBengal PollsNirmala SitharamanIPL Orange Cap

Vamsikrishna 0
Sanjay Singh held a press conference NEW DELHI: The Aam Aadmi Party has petitioned Rajya Sabha chairman, vice president CP Radhakrishnan to terminate all 7 member of Parliament who quit the part and joined the Bharatiya Janata Party, said leader Sanjay Singh on Sunday.He said AAP had consulted constitutional experts, including senior advocate Kapil Sibal and former Lok Sabha Secretary-General PDT Achary, who were of the opinion that that the MPs were “liable for disqualification under the law”.The political crisis within the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) deepened after 7 Rajya Sabha MPs announced on Friday, saying they’re leaving the party, triggering a sharp legal and political dispute over the validity of the move and its implications under anti-defection rules.Among the MPs named in the controversy are Raghav Chadha, Sandeep Pathak, Ashok Mittal, Harbhajan Singh, Rajinder Gupta, Swati Maliwal and Vikramjit Sahney. Chadha has suggested the departures stem from “disappointment, disengagement and disgust” within the party, while Sahney cited governance concerns in Punjab, including debt stress, agrarian issues and drug abuse, as well as alleged lack of access to leadership.Party insiders say the leadership was aware of possible defections and had attempted last-minute efforts to prevent at least some MPs from leaving, amid claims of political pressure and internal dissatisfaction.Earlier reports stated that Punjab CM Bhagwant Mannalso sought time from President Droupadi Murmu along with party MLAs to press for a “recall” of the MPs, even though the Constitution does not provide for any recall mechanism for Members of Parliament or state legislators.AAP has strongly contested the development. Earlier, Sanjay Singh had cited the Tenth Schedule, asserting that defections of this nature are not legally valid and should lead to disqualification proceedings.However, legal opinion remains divided. While AAP leaders argue that any such split is unconstitutional, several experts note that the anti-defection law permits a merger if supported by two-thirds of a legislature party, raising questions over whether the move would actually attract disqualification.Singh also dismissed reports that Punjab MLAs are in contact with Raghav Chadha, calling it “false propaganda” aimed at creating confusion. He alleged that such narratives were being circulated by the BJP and others, and claimed that the leaders in question were facing public backlash in Punjab. Singh said people were protesting against them and that their political standing had weakened, adding that with their “membership about to end,” it was unlikely that any MLA would associate with them.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDRDO Unveils Next-Gen Armoured Platforms Designed For Multi-Terrain Combat And Rapid DeploymentRahul Gandhi Reacts to Cong Worker Killing in WB, Seeks Strict Action and JusticeEngine Failure Forces Emergency Evacuation of Swiss Delhi-Zurich Flight; Six InjuredManipur Govt Addresses COCOMI Demands After Protesters Clash With Police During March To CM’S HousePM Modi Condemns Shooting Near White House Dinner, Says ‘Violence Has No Place’Strait of Hormuz to US Elections: Ex-CJI Maps Shockwave of Global InterconnectionSwati Maliwal Launches Fresh Attack On Kejriwal After BJP Switch Over ‘Rs 100 Cr House’Raghav Chadha Sees 1 Million Drop In Followers After BJP Move, Gen Z ReactsOpposition Moves Fresh Bid to Remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Levels 9 ChargesAAP Fury Explodes: “Gaddar” Written On Harbhajan Singh’s House After BJP Move123PhotostoriesStep inside S. Sreesanth’s crores worth Kochi bungalow: A multi-acre property defined by cricket journey, comebacks and family-first living6 cooling foods Ayurveda recommends during extreme heatDo you know why Japanese people are so successful? The answer lies in their childhoodStop the feud: 5 gentle dog breeds that actually love living with cats7 natural ways to remove pests from home and garden10 powerful parenting quotes by Sadhguru to raise happy and confident childrenBored of plain green tea? Try these 6 weight-loss-friendly recipes5 books to read if you want to manifest your dreams8 Indian dishes that foreigners often misunderstandFrom Alaska to Argentina: 10 longest roads that span the globe123Hot PicksTamil Nadu ElectionWest Bengal voter turnoutAssembly Election 2026Mamata BanerjeeTamil Nadu voter turnoutAmit ShahPM ModiTop TrendingRaghav Chadha Joins BJPTamil Nadu electionAP SSC Class 10 resultsRRB opens qualificationAIIMS B.Sc. coursesJac Class 12 ResultPatrick MahomesBengal PollsNirmala SitharamanIPL Orange Cap

Sanjay Singh held a press conference NEW DELHI: The Aam Aadmi Party has petitioned Rajya Sabha chairman, vice president CP Radhakrishnan to terminate all 7 member of Parliament who quit the part and joined the Bharatiya Janata Party, said leader Sanjay Singh on Sunday.He said AAP had consulted constitutional experts, including senior advocate Kapil Sibal and former Lok Sabha Secretary-General PDT Achary, who were of the opinion that that the MPs were “liable for disqualification under the law”.The political crisis within the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) deepened after 7 Rajya Sabha MPs announced on Friday, saying they’re leaving the party, triggering a sharp legal and political dispute over the validity of the move and its implications under anti-defection rules.Among the MPs named in the controversy are Raghav Chadha, Sandeep Pathak, Ashok Mittal, Harbhajan Singh, Rajinder Gupta, Swati Maliwal and Vikramjit Sahney. Chadha has suggested the departures stem from “disappointment, disengagement and disgust” within the party, while Sahney cited governance concerns in Punjab, including debt stress, agrarian issues and drug abuse, as well as alleged lack of access to leadership.Party insiders say the leadership was aware of possible defections and had attempted last-minute efforts to prevent at least some MPs from leaving, amid claims of political pressure and internal dissatisfaction.Earlier reports stated that Punjab CM Bhagwant Mannalso sought time from President Droupadi Murmu along with party MLAs to press for a “recall” of the MPs, even though the Constitution does not provide for any recall mechanism for Members of Parliament or state legislators.AAP has strongly contested the development. Earlier, Sanjay Singh had cited the Tenth Schedule, asserting that defections of this nature are not legally valid and should lead to disqualification proceedings.However, legal opinion remains divided. While AAP leaders argue that any such split is unconstitutional, several experts note that the anti-defection law permits a merger if supported by two-thirds of a legislature party, raising questions over whether the move would actually attract disqualification.Singh also dismissed reports that Punjab MLAs are in contact with Raghav Chadha, calling it “false propaganda” aimed at creating confusion. He alleged that such narratives were being circulated by the BJP and others, and claimed that the leaders in question were facing public backlash in Punjab. Singh said people were protesting against them and that their political standing had weakened, adding that with their “membership about to end,” it was unlikely that any MLA would associate with them.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDRDO Unveils Next-Gen Armoured Platforms Designed For Multi-Terrain Combat And Rapid DeploymentRahul Gandhi Reacts to Cong Worker Killing in WB, Seeks Strict Action and JusticeEngine Failure Forces Emergency Evacuation of Swiss Delhi-Zurich Flight; Six InjuredManipur Govt Addresses COCOMI Demands After Protesters Clash With Police During March To CM’S HousePM Modi Condemns Shooting Near White House Dinner, Says ‘Violence Has No Place’Strait of Hormuz to US Elections: Ex-CJI Maps Shockwave of Global InterconnectionSwati Maliwal Launches Fresh Attack On Kejriwal After BJP Switch Over ‘Rs 100 Cr House’Raghav Chadha Sees 1 Million Drop In Followers After BJP Move, Gen Z ReactsOpposition Moves Fresh Bid to Remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Levels 9 ChargesAAP Fury Explodes: “Gaddar” Written On Harbhajan Singh’s House After BJP Move123PhotostoriesStep inside S. Sreesanth’s crores worth Kochi bungalow: A multi-acre property defined by cricket journey, comebacks and family-first living6 cooling foods Ayurveda recommends during extreme heatDo you know why Japanese people are so successful? The answer lies in their childhoodStop the feud: 5 gentle dog breeds that actually love living with cats7 natural ways to remove pests from home and garden10 powerful parenting quotes by Sadhguru to raise happy and confident childrenBored of plain green tea? Try these 6 weight-loss-friendly recipes5 books to read if you want to manifest your dreams8 Indian dishes that foreigners often misunderstandFrom Alaska to Argentina: 10 longest roads that span the globe123Hot PicksTamil Nadu ElectionWest Bengal voter turnoutAssembly Election 2026Mamata BanerjeeTamil Nadu voter turnoutAmit ShahPM ModiTop TrendingRaghav Chadha Joins BJPTamil Nadu electionAP SSC Class 10 resultsRRB opens qualificationAIIMS B.Sc. coursesJac Class 12 ResultPatrick MahomesBengal PollsNirmala SitharamanIPL Orange Cap

Vamsikrishna 0
Newsmatic - News WordPress Theme 2026. Powered By BlazeThemes.