. NEW DELHI: A parliamentary standing committee on Wednesday highlighted regulatory and implementation challenges in securing environment and forest clearances for coal mining projects and called for structural reforms to streamline approvals as India targets major production expansion.The findings are part of its report on “expediting and simplifying the environment and forest clearance process for coal mining projects,” which was tabled in both houses of Parliament. The panel, headed by BJP MP Anurag Thakur, mentioned in the report that difficulty in securing land for compensatory afforestation, a mandatory requirement under forest clearance rules, was one of the major challenges and suggested a slew of measures to overcome it. The coal mines that are providing tap water to 100s of villages | I Witness The committee said the identification of land was “critical and time-consuming,” with delays exacerbated by the absence of pre-identified land banks in coal-bearing states.While guidelines already permit land banks under state forest departments, the committee recommended that the ministry of environment, forest and climate change and the ministry of coal actively pursue states to develop land banks of degraded forest and suitable non-forest land to speed up approvals. While India has already reached a record 1 billion tonnes of coal production in FY 2024-25, the ministry of coal aims to raise output to 1.5 billion tonnes by 2030.The committee also flagged inconsistency in compensatory afforestation costs across states, which currently range from Rs 9 lakh to Rs 22 lakh per hectare. This variation has created uncertainty and disputes for project developers. It sought explanations for the disparity and urged steps to bring greater uniformity.The report highlighted that obtaining environmental clearance and forest clearance remain a protracted process. On average, EC approvals take 15–18 months for central public sector undertakings and 26 months for private coal blocks. Forest clearance procedures take even longer – 24–30 months for central PSUs and up to 34 months for private miners. The committee called for “concerted efforts” to reduce the timelines for both public and private sector projects.While acknowledging initiatives like PARIVESH, an integrated online portal for environmental, forest, wildlife, and coastal regulation zone clearances, and the single window clearance system, the report said several key approvals—such as those from the directorate general of Mines Safety and the central ground water authority—continue to be processed separately. For complex cases involving multiple agencies, the panel recommended a “harmonised coordination mechanism” to prevent duplication and ensure accountability.The committee underlined that outdated and inconsistent forest land records remain a major source of delay. Since land is a state subject, diversion orders and tree-felling permissions vary widely. It urged coal-producing states to digitise Jamabandi/Khasra maps to clearly demarcate recorded forest, deemed forest and non-forest land, and to comply with recent Supreme Court directions to create consolidated digital forest records, including for unclassed and community forests.About the AuthorAtul MathurAtul Mathur, Deputy Metro Editor (Senior Assistant Editor), at The Times of India, has over 26 years of experience in journalism. Based in Delhi, he has extensively reported on governance, policy and politics, offering readers deeply researched, data-driven insights into the workings of the capital. Known for his in-depth investigative reporting and compelling human-interest narratives, Atul brings clarity and context to complex urban and civic issues.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosExplained: Did Mexico Follow Trump’s Footsteps To Slap Tariff on India? Impact on Indian TradersKharge Hits Back As JP Nadda Slams Nehru, Congress Over Vande Mataram In Rajya SabhaSouth Asian Bloc Minus India? Why Pak’s Fresh Regional Pitch Fails On Economics, Politics, Geography‘Hands Were Trembling’: Rahul Gandhi Takes Sharp Dig At Amit Shah Over Ls AddressTrump’s $1 Million Gold Card Explained: What America’s Costliest Visa Means For Indian ApplicantsUS Clears $686 Million F-16 Upgrade For Pakistan, Sparking Major Strategic Ripples Across South AsiaGoa Club Owners Saurabh & Gaurav Luthra Arrested in Phuket After Deadly Fire‘Damaging India, Hurting America’: Jayapal Flags Tariff Crisis Hitting Both NationsAmid Flight Meltdown, IndiGo Chairman Denies Claims of Rule Manipulation and Crisis EngineeringIndia-US Relations Face Hurdle As US Engages Pakistan Military, Says Dhruva Jaishankar123Photostories10 quick Korean phrases you can learn before you land in KoreaAre Khalid Al Ameri and Sunainaa Yella getting married? Inside the love story Instagram tried to soft-launch8 types of comforting Chaats to enjoy during winterPriyanka Chopra to Katrina Kaif: Decoding bridal jewellery of Bollywood actresses that belongs in your wedding vanityDhurandhar, Mission Majnu, Raazi; Gripping spy movies that expose and destroy deadly terror plots5 aggressive pet fish that aren’t for beginnersHow IGI Airport Is Using AI and Upgraded Runways to Beat Winter Fog9 heart-healthy foods with the highest amount of Omega 3 fatty acids8 everyday popular foreign brands Indians often assume are IndianBaby boy names inspired by Lord Vishnu123Hot PicksParliament Winter SessionTrump Gold CardSpiceJet FlightGold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays NovemberBank Holidays NovemberTop TrendingSherrone MooreIsaiah RiderStephen CurryAdrian MorejonFerrari Carnage KolkataOlivia DunneMohan BhagwatBengaluru CrimePaige Shiver Net WorthGabrielle Union
NEW DELHI: A parliamentary standing committee on Wednesday highlighted regulatory and implementation challenges in securing environment and forest clearances for coal mining projects and called for structural reforms to streamline approvals as India targets major production expansion.The findings are part of its report on “expediting and simplifying the environment and forest clearance process for coal mining projects,” which was tabled in both houses of Parliament. The panel, headed by BJP MP Anurag Thakur, mentioned in the report that difficulty in securing land for compensatory afforestation, a mandatory requirement under forest clearance rules, was one of the major challenges and suggested a slew of measures to overcome it.
The committee said the identification of land was “critical and time-consuming,” with delays exacerbated by the absence of pre-identified land banks in coal-bearing states.While guidelines already permit land banks under state forest departments, the committee recommended that the ministry of environment, forest and climate change and the ministry of coal actively pursue states to develop land banks of degraded forest and suitable non-forest land to speed up approvals. While India has already reached a record 1 billion tonnes of coal production in FY 2024-25, the ministry of coal aims to raise output to 1.5 billion tonnes by 2030.The committee also flagged inconsistency in compensatory afforestation costs across states, which currently range from Rs 9 lakh to Rs 22 lakh per hectare. This variation has created uncertainty and disputes for project developers. It sought explanations for the disparity and urged steps to bring greater uniformity.The report highlighted that obtaining environmental clearance and forest clearance remain a protracted process. On average, EC approvals take 15–18 months for central public sector undertakings and 26 months for private coal blocks. Forest clearance procedures take even longer – 24–30 months for central PSUs and up to 34 months for private miners. The committee called for “concerted efforts” to reduce the timelines for both public and private sector projects.While acknowledging initiatives like PARIVESH, an integrated online portal for environmental, forest, wildlife, and coastal regulation zone clearances, and the single window clearance system, the report said several key approvals—such as those from the directorate general of Mines Safety and the central ground water authority—continue to be processed separately. For complex cases involving multiple agencies, the panel recommended a “harmonised coordination mechanism” to prevent duplication and ensure accountability.The committee underlined that outdated and inconsistent forest land records remain a major source of delay. Since land is a state subject, diversion orders and tree-felling permissions vary widely. It urged coal-producing states to digitise Jamabandi/Khasra maps to clearly demarcate recorded forest, deemed forest and non-forest land, and to comply with recent Supreme Court directions to create consolidated digital forest records, including for unclassed and community forests.
