File photo NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Tuesday issued notices to former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, ex-deputy CM Manish Sisodia and other AAP leaders in a criminal contempt case linked to alleged “vilifying” and defamatory social media posts targeting a judge.The high court also granted four weeks to AAP politicians to file their responses in the matter. The next hearing has been scheduled for August 4.The contempt proceedings stem from the ongoing Delhi excise policy case, in which the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has challenged a trial court order discharging Kejriwal, Sisodia and 21 others.The contempt case relates to allegations that certain social media posts and online campaigns attempted to scandalise the judiciary and undermine the authority of the court after Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma declined to recuse herself from hearing the matter.Contempt proceedings shifted to another benchJustice Sharma had earlier observed that “extremely vilifying, extremely contemptuous, and defamatory material” was being circulated against her and the court. She said she had decided to initiate contempt proceedings against some respondents and other alleged contemnors.The judge, however, clarified that she was not recusing herself from the excise policy matter but transferred the main case to another bench on grounds of “judicial propriety and discipline” after initiating contempt proceedings.The contempt matter has now been assigned to a division bench comprising Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja, while Justice Manoj Jain is expected to hear the CBI’s revision plea challenging the discharge order.Background of excise policy caseThe controversy began after a trial court on February 27 discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia and 21 others in the alleged liquor policy irregularities case, ruling that the prosecution’s case “stood entirely discredited”.Justice Sharma had also rejected Kejriwal’s plea seeking her recusal from the matter, saying the application did not meet the legal threshold for establishing a reasonable apprehension of bias.Several AAP leaders had boycotted proceedings before Justice Sharma after her refusal to step aside from the case.In her order initiating contempt action, Justice Sharma reportedly observed that while fair criticism of judicial orders is permissible, “there is a distinction between fair criticism and running a campaign to portray a judge as biased.”About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosTMC Alleges ‘Vote Chori’ In Bengal Polls, BJP Says TMC Must Introspect Over DefeatMEA’s Sibi George Defends India After Reporter Questions ‘Why the World Should Trust India’“Fuel Prices Rise Again”: Petrol, Diesel Rates Hiked Across India Amid Global Oil SurgeTamil Nadu CM Vijay Pays Tribute To Former LTTE Chief Prabhakaran On Death AnniversaryIndia’s Agni Missile Journey: Could Agni-VI Become A 10,000 KM ICBM?Suvendu Adhikari Says ED Granted Sanction To Prosecute Sandeep Ghosh In R.G. Kar CaseNorwegian Reporters Question India On Trust And PM Modi’s Media Interactions During Oslo VisitIndia Invites Norway For Big Investment Push In Shipbuilding And Green Energy Sectors’Time Has Come’: Suvendu’s ‘Deportation’ Warning In Bhabanipur, Vows Action Over Kolkata ViolenceDelhi High Court Denies Interim Relief To Vinesh Phogat, Wrestler Barred From Asian Games Trials123PhotostoriesTara Sutaria’s vintage ina modern home speaks Victorian minimalism: Art inspirations to take awayFrom elephant aunties to lesbian birds: 5 wild animal queens that rule harder than humans ever couldTamil Nadu shuts down 15% of alcohol stores: 5 Indian states where alcohol is completely bannedTraditional Indian cooling methods that still work todayLast chance! 5 tiger safaris to experience in India before the wildlife season ends in JuneNavjot Singh Sidhu’s ₹25 crore luxury mansion in Amritsar is defined by cricket success, ancient trees, and palace-style interiorsWho is Josh Heuston? Inside the rise of ‘Off Campus’ breakout star Justin KohlArt quote of the day by Pablo Picasso: “Art washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life”From samosas to dokla: 10 common Indian snacks and how many calories they containWhat Gurukul education taught children that modern schools often miss123Hot PicksSBI apprentice recruitment 2026US Iran warCBSE Class 12 re-evaluation 2026Gold price predictionAdani Group stocksNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingTwisha SharmaIOCL share priceFifa World Cup 2026Subnautica 2 Enameled Glass GuideWWE Raw HighlightsIPL 2026IPL Orange Cap 2026India VS Afghanistan Squad AnnouncementLeviathan in Subnautica 2Fuel Price Hike
NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Tuesday issued notices to former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, ex-deputy CM Manish Sisodia and other AAP leaders in a criminal contempt case linked to alleged “vilifying” and defamatory social media posts targeting a judge.The high court also granted four weeks to AAP politicians to file their responses in the matter. The next hearing has been scheduled for August 4.The contempt proceedings stem from the ongoing Delhi excise policy case, in which the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has challenged a trial court order discharging Kejriwal, Sisodia and 21 others.The contempt case relates to allegations that certain social media posts and online campaigns attempted to scandalise the judiciary and undermine the authority of the court after Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma declined to recuse herself from hearing the matter.
Contempt proceedings shifted to another bench
Justice Sharma had earlier observed that “extremely vilifying, extremely contemptuous, and defamatory material” was being circulated against her and the court. She said she had decided to initiate contempt proceedings against some respondents and other alleged contemnors.The judge, however, clarified that she was not recusing herself from the excise policy matter but transferred the main case to another bench on grounds of “judicial propriety and discipline” after initiating contempt proceedings.The contempt matter has now been assigned to a division bench comprising Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja, while Justice Manoj Jain is expected to hear the CBI’s revision plea challenging the discharge order.
Background of excise policy case
The controversy began after a trial court on February 27 discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia and 21 others in the alleged liquor policy irregularities case, ruling that the prosecution’s case “stood entirely discredited”.Justice Sharma had also rejected Kejriwal’s plea seeking her recusal from the matter, saying the application did not meet the legal threshold for establishing a reasonable apprehension of bias.Several AAP leaders had boycotted proceedings before Justice Sharma after her refusal to step aside from the case.In her order initiating contempt action, Justice Sharma reportedly observed that while fair criticism of judicial orders is permissible, “there is a distinction between fair criticism and running a campaign to portray a judge as biased.”
