File photo NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to test the validity of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, as a bunch of petitions challenged the constitutionality of the new provisions annulling self-perceived gender identity of persons and stripping trans men and trans masculine identities of statutory recognition.Senior advocate A M Singhvi, leading a group of advocates including Shraddha Deshmukh, Jyana Kothari and Arundhati Katju, told a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that the amended clauses directly breach SC’s 2014 judgment in NALSA case giving sanctity to right of self-determination of gender to the trans population.”NALSA judgment, which provided for self-identification and self-determination – is nullified by the legislature without removing its basis, which is impermissible,” Singhvi said.Justice Bagchi said, “Do not take NALSA judgment to that level. NALSA said self-determination is a facet of dignity. What the amendment has done is it changed the substratum of law based on which NALSA interpreted self-identification as part of Article 21. Instead of self-determination, it now provides for medical identification and verification prior to certification.”Singhvi said the overwhelming characteristic is man to woman and if one is undergoing hormone therapy to sync gender identity with the self-determined gender, the law criminalises it and hence would deprive them of that treatment.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta interjected and said, “What is criminalised is forceful change of gender through surgery. There are instances where children have been castrated. The law penalises forcible gender alterations.”The CJI-led bench asked whether there are any benefits or social welfare schemes under the Transgender Act for those classified as transgenders. Singhvi said there are no benefits for them but it allows them to have identity cards which ensures their inclusion in all welfare schemes.SC issued notice to Centre and states and sought their response in six weeks while posting further hearing before a 3-judge bench.PollWhat impact do you think the amendment will have on transgender rights?It will restrict rightsIt may provide some protectionsIt will have no impactFollow the latest election results 2026, live updates, winner lists, constituency-wise results, party-wise trends and full coverage for Tamil Nadu election results, West Bengal election results, Kerala election results, Assam election results and Puducherry election results results on Times of India.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPunjab Showdown: AAP MLAs Head to President Over Rajya Sabha RowIndia Rejects Nepal’s Objection To Kailash Mansarovar Yatra Route Via Lipulekh PassNepal Objects To India-China Plan To Conduct Kailash Mansarovar Yatra Via LipulekhIndia-Linked LPG Tanker MT Sarv Shakti Heads To Visakhapatnam After Crossing HormuzPassenger Opens Emergency Exit Door On Air Arabia Flight While Taxiing At Chennai Airport, ArrestedAhead Of Counting, Gunmen Open Fire At BJP Leader’s House In Bengal’s Noapara‘I Am Also A Victim’: Vinesh Phogat Identifies As Complainant In Brij Bhushan Sexual Harassment CaseBJP MP Sandeep Pathak Claims ‘No Information’ On FIRs, Alleges Misuse Of State Machinery In PunjabIndian Startup Launches Mission Drishti, World’s First OptoSAR Satellite, Aboard SpaceX Falcon 9Diljit Dosanjh Confronts Khalistan Supporters at Calgary Concert, Explains KBC Appearance123PhotostoriesIndian billionaire Sudha Reddy stuns at Met Gala 2026 – but it’s her ₹142 crore tanzanite necklace that has everyone talkingElon Musk’s 9 am high-protein breakfast includes these 3 foods5 Met Gala food rules you probably did not knowFrom Garlic to selfies: What items are banned at the MET Gala?Metrics used in India to measure homes and how to convert them easilyStruggling in a 400 sq ft home? These design tricks can make it feel twice as big8 Delhi street food spots you must visit at least once in your lifeBad Bunny to Colman Domingo: Met Gala 2026 best-dressed menBeautiful plants you can grow without soil10 popular and unique baby boy names with letter J123Hot PicksBarrackpore election resultTiruchirappalli election resultMettupalayam election resultsEttumanoor election resultPerambur election resultBagnan election resultKazhakkoottam election resultTop TrendingWest Bengal Assembly Election ResultsAssam Assembly Election ResultsTamil Nadu Assembly Election ResultsKerala Assembly Election ResultsPuducherry Assembly Election ResultsBhabanipur election results 2026West Bengal Election Results 2026NEET 2026: Exam-day guideHPBose 12th ResultTVK Chief Vijay

File photo NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to test the validity of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, as a bunch of petitions challenged the constitutionality of the new provisions annulling self-perceived gender identity of persons and stripping trans men and trans masculine identities of statutory recognition.Senior advocate A M Singhvi, leading a group of advocates including Shraddha Deshmukh, Jyana Kothari and Arundhati Katju, told a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that the amended clauses directly breach SC’s 2014 judgment in NALSA case giving sanctity to right of self-determination of gender to the trans population.”NALSA judgment, which provided for self-identification and self-determination – is nullified by the legislature without removing its basis, which is impermissible,” Singhvi said.Justice Bagchi said, “Do not take NALSA judgment to that level. NALSA said self-determination is a facet of dignity. What the amendment has done is it changed the substratum of law based on which NALSA interpreted self-identification as part of Article 21. Instead of self-determination, it now provides for medical identification and verification prior to certification.”Singhvi said the overwhelming characteristic is man to woman and if one is undergoing hormone therapy to sync gender identity with the self-determined gender, the law criminalises it and hence would deprive them of that treatment.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta interjected and said, “What is criminalised is forceful change of gender through surgery. There are instances where children have been castrated. The law penalises forcible gender alterations.”The CJI-led bench asked whether there are any benefits or social welfare schemes under the Transgender Act for those classified as transgenders. Singhvi said there are no benefits for them but it allows them to have identity cards which ensures their inclusion in all welfare schemes.SC issued notice to Centre and states and sought their response in six weeks while posting further hearing before a 3-judge bench.PollWhat impact do you think the amendment will have on transgender rights?It will restrict rightsIt may provide some protectionsIt will have no impactFollow the latest election results 2026, live updates, winner lists, constituency-wise results, party-wise trends and full coverage for Tamil Nadu election results, West Bengal election results, Kerala election results, Assam election results and Puducherry election results results on Times of India.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPunjab Showdown: AAP MLAs Head to President Over Rajya Sabha RowIndia Rejects Nepal’s Objection To Kailash Mansarovar Yatra Route Via Lipulekh PassNepal Objects To India-China Plan To Conduct Kailash Mansarovar Yatra Via LipulekhIndia-Linked LPG Tanker MT Sarv Shakti Heads To Visakhapatnam After Crossing HormuzPassenger Opens Emergency Exit Door On Air Arabia Flight While Taxiing At Chennai Airport, ArrestedAhead Of Counting, Gunmen Open Fire At BJP Leader’s House In Bengal’s Noapara‘I Am Also A Victim’: Vinesh Phogat Identifies As Complainant In Brij Bhushan Sexual Harassment CaseBJP MP Sandeep Pathak Claims ‘No Information’ On FIRs, Alleges Misuse Of State Machinery In PunjabIndian Startup Launches Mission Drishti, World’s First OptoSAR Satellite, Aboard SpaceX Falcon 9Diljit Dosanjh Confronts Khalistan Supporters at Calgary Concert, Explains KBC Appearance123PhotostoriesIndian billionaire Sudha Reddy stuns at Met Gala 2026 – but it’s her ₹142 crore tanzanite necklace that has everyone talkingElon Musk’s 9 am high-protein breakfast includes these 3 foods5 Met Gala food rules you probably did not knowFrom Garlic to selfies: What items are banned at the MET Gala?Metrics used in India to measure homes and how to convert them easilyStruggling in a 400 sq ft home? These design tricks can make it feel twice as big8 Delhi street food spots you must visit at least once in your lifeBad Bunny to Colman Domingo: Met Gala 2026 best-dressed menBeautiful plants you can grow without soil10 popular and unique baby boy names with letter J123Hot PicksBarrackpore election resultTiruchirappalli election resultMettupalayam election resultsEttumanoor election resultPerambur election resultBagnan election resultKazhakkoottam election resultTop TrendingWest Bengal Assembly Election ResultsAssam Assembly Election ResultsTamil Nadu Assembly Election ResultsKerala Assembly Election ResultsPuducherry Assembly Election ResultsBhabanipur election results 2026West Bengal Election Results 2026NEET 2026: Exam-day guideHPBose 12th ResultTVK Chief Vijay


Supreme Court to test validity of scrapping 'self-perceived gender' clause

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to test the validity of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, as a bunch of petitions challenged the constitutionality of the new provisions annulling self-perceived gender identity of persons and stripping trans men and trans masculine identities of statutory recognition.Senior advocate A M Singhvi, leading a group of advocates including Shraddha Deshmukh, Jyana Kothari and Arundhati Katju, told a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that the amended clauses directly breach SC’s 2014 judgment in NALSA case giving sanctity to right of self-determination of gender to the trans population.“NALSA judgment, which provided for self-identification and self-determination – is nullified by the legislature without removing its basis, which is impermissible,” Singhvi said.Justice Bagchi said, “Do not take NALSA judgment to that level. NALSA said self-determination is a facet of dignity. What the amendment has done is it changed the substratum of law based on which NALSA interpreted self-identification as part of Article 21. Instead of self-determination, it now provides for medical identification and verification prior to certification.”Singhvi said the overwhelming characteristic is man to woman and if one is undergoing hormone therapy to sync gender identity with the self-determined gender, the law criminalises it and hence would deprive them of that treatment.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta interjected and said, “What is criminalised is forceful change of gender through surgery. There are instances where children have been castrated. The law penalises forcible gender alterations.”The CJI-led bench asked whether there are any benefits or social welfare schemes under the Transgender Act for those classified as transgenders. Singhvi said there are no benefits for them but it allows them to have identity cards which ensures their inclusion in all welfare schemes.SC issued notice to Centre and states and sought their response in six weeks while posting further hearing before a 3-judge bench.

Poll

What impact do you think the amendment will have on transgender rights?



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *